Monday, June 6, 2016

AMERCA'S OPIOID ADDICTION: Pain is a problem but Opioids are not the answer.

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/medical_examiner/2016/06/prince_s_death_reveals_how_wrong_our_over_reliance_on_dangerous_opioids.html


e learned Thursday that Prince died of an opioid overdose—specifically from fentanyl, a synthetic opioid often prescribed to people who have built up a tolerance to oral opioids. (Fentanyl is more potent than powerful drugs like OxyContin and is most commonly administered via a patch.) While the toxicology report has not yet been made public—and may never be—it’s possible that Prince, who had a reputation for living substance-free but also suffered from debilitating hip and knee pain, got his drugs from his doctor, not a dealer. Why would the legendary recording artist have been prescribed a drug that put his life at risk?
There’s no question that opioids are effective at managing certain types of pain. But American medicine has become far too reliant on the potentially dangerous drugs for the wrong reasons. About 15 years ago, hospital watchdog groups grew concerned that physicians were not taking pain management seriously enough. The solution to this perceived epidemic of pain in the early 2000s was opioids. These strong painkillers became the drug of choice as ibuprofen (the active ingredient in Advil, Motrin, and similar products) had fallen out of favor thanks to overblown concernsabout the risks of internal bleeding.
Around the same time, pharmaceutical companies noticed a now infamous studyfrom 1986 suggesting that opioids were less addictive than previously thought. The author of that paper has since publicly recanted its conclusions, calling the sample size of 38 individuals too small. But pharmaceutical companies used this small, now roundly debunked study to convince professional medical organizations, and eventually hospital regulators, that it was safe to give opioids to more patients. Since the early 1990s, the annual number of opioid prescriptions has tripled. Opioid overdose deaths have quadrupled. Today, Americans consume 80 percent of the world’s (legal) opioids, despite accounting for less than 5 percent of the world population.
There’s no single villain in this story. Our dangerous embrace of opioids was the result of the entire medical establishment—including governmental, nonprofit, and pharmaceutical organizations—searching for an answer to the problem of pain. That problem is real: Managing pain, specifically chronic pain, is an essential part of any doctor’s practice. It is terrible to see people suffer and whenever possible and prudent, pain should be treated. And some of the players in this story were driven by real concern for patients’ quality of life. But others, specifically the manufacturers, were driven by crasser motives: the realization that they could make a fortune by pushing for wider use of prescription opioids.

Morning Joe unloads on Trump: He is NOT ENDORSING TRUMP! 'He is getting worse'

http://theweek.com/speedreads/628294/joe-scarborough-just-unleashed-fury-donald-trump


On Monday, Morning Joe host Joe Scarboroughunleashed on Donald Trump and slammed the Republican Party for endorsing a "racist" man, after Trump publicly questioned the ability of Muslim and Mexican judges to rule impartially against him. Last Thursday, Trump said U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel, who is presiding over a civil lawsuit against Trump University, had an "absolute conflict" and should recuse himself from the case because of his Mexican heritage; Trump has called for a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border and for banning Muslim immigration.
"These Republicans this week who were so shocked and stunned and deeply saddened and offended by this clear act of racism had all the evidence in the world before that he had done things that — again — stopped them from endorsing him," Scarborough said. "How do you endorse, Paul Ryan, a man that supports the banning of 1.4 billion Muslims from ever entering the United States of America? You make him back down, actually."
Scarborough then admitted that he'd previously tried to convince Trump to rethink some of his ideas, but to no avail. "That's what I was hoping, that perhaps we could put pressure on him to back down and change that policy," Scarborough said to MSNBC's Al Sharpton. "Instead, Al, he's doubled down. And now it's people that may have — what is it? One-sixteenth Mexican blood? If you've got one-sixteenth Mexican blood than maybe you can't be a judge. One-sixteenth Muslim blood? I mean, this is unbelievable. He is getting worse, not better."
Watch Scarborough's takedown - follow the link

Sunday, June 5, 2016

A raped girl speaks to her college rapist.

https://www.sccgov.org/sites/da/newsroom/newsreleases/Documents/B-Turner%20VIS.pdf


I have done enough explaining. You do not get to shrug your shoulders and be confused anymore. You do not get to pretend that there were no red flags. You do not get to not know why you ran. You have been convicted of violating me with malicious intent, and all you can admit to is consuming alcohol. Do not talk about the sad way your life was upturned because alcohol made you do bad things. Figure out how to take responsibility for your own conduct. Lastly you said, I want to show people that one night of drinking can ruin a life. Ruin a life, one life, yours, you forgot about mine. Let me rephrase for you, I want to show people that one night of drinking can ruin two lives. You and me. You are the cause, I am the effect. You have dragged me through this hell with you, dipped me back into that night again and again. You knocked down both our towers, I collapsed at the same time you did. Your damage was concrete; stripped of titles, degrees, enrollment. My damage was internal, unseen, I carry it with me. You took away my worth, my privacy, my energy, my time, my safety, my intimacy, my confidence, my own voice, until today. See one thing we have in common is that we were both unable to get up in the morning. I am no stranger to suffering. You made me a victim. In newspapers my name was “unconscious intoxicated woman”, ten syllables, and nothing more than that. For a while, I believed that that was all I was. I had to force myself to relearn my real name, my identity. To relearn that this is not all that I am. That I am not just a drunk victim at a frat party found behind a dumpster, while you are the All-American swimmer at a top university, innocent until proven guilty, with so much at stake. I am a human being who has been irreversibly hurt, who waited a year to figure out if I was worth something. 9 My independence, natural joy, gentleness, and steady lifestyle I had been enjoying became distorted beyond recognition. I became closed off, angry, self-deprecating, tired, irritable, empty. The isolation at times was unbearable. You cannot give me back the life I had before that night either. While you worry about your shattered reputation, I refrigerated spoons every night so when I woke up, and my eyes were puffy from crying, I would hold the spoons to my eyes to lessen the swelling so that I could see. I showed up an hour late to work every morning, excused myself to cry in the stairwells, I can tell you all the best places in that building to cry where no one can hear you, the pain became so bad that I had to tell my boss I was leaving, I needed time because continuing day to day was not possible. I used my savings to go as far away as I could possibly be. I can’t sleep alone at night without having a light on, like a five year old, because I have nightmares of being touched where I cannot wake up, I did this thing where I waited until the sun came up and I felt safe enough to sleep. For three months, I went to bed at six o’clock in the morning. I used to pride myself on my independence, now I am afraid to go on walks in the evening, to attend social events with drinking among friends where I should be comfortable being. I have become a little barnacle always needing to be at someone’s side, to have my boyfriend standing next to me, sleeping beside me, protecting me. It is embarrassing how feeble I feel, how timidly I move through life, always guarded, ready to defend myself, ready to be angry. You have no idea how hard I have worked to rebuild parts of me that are still weak. It took me eight months to even talk about what happened. I could no longer connect with friends, with everyone around me. I would scream at my boyfriend, my own family whenever they brought this up. You never let me forget what happened to me. At the of end of the hearing, the trial, I was too tired to speak. I would leave drained, silent. I would go home turn off my phone and for days I would not speak. You bought me a ticket to a planet where I lived by myself. Every time a new article come out, I lived with the paranoia that my entire hometown would find out and know me as the girl who got assaulted. I didn’t want anyone’s pity and am still learning to accept victim as part of my identity. You made my own hometown an uncomfortable place to be. Someday, you can pay me back for my ambulance ride and therapy. But you cannot give me back my sleepless nights. The way I have broken down sobbing uncontrollably if I’m watching a movie and a woman is harmed, to say it lightly, this experience has expanded my empathy for other victims. I have lost weight from stress, when people would comment I told them I’ve been running a lot lately. There are times I did not want to be touched. I have to relearn that I am not fragile, I am capable, I am wholesome, not just livid and weak. I want to say this. All the crying, the hurting you have imposed on me, I can take it. But when I see my younger sister hurting, when she is unable to keep up in school, when she is deprived of joy, when she is not sleeping, when she is crying so hard on the phone she is barely breathing, telling me over and over she is sorry for leaving me alone that night, sorry sorry sorry, when she feels more guilt than you, then I do not forgive you. That night I had called her to try and find her, but you found me first. Your attorney's closing statement began, "My sister said she was fine 10 and who knows her better than her sister." You tried to use my own sister against me. Your points of attack were so weak, so low, it was almost embarrassing. You do not touch her. If you think I was spared, came out unscathed, that today I ride off into sunset, while you suffer the greatest blow, you are mistaken. Nobody wins. We have all been devastated, we have all been trying to find some meaning in all of this suffering. You should have never done this to me. Secondly, you should have never made me fight so long to tell you, you should have never done this to me. But here we are. The damage is done, no one can undo it. And now we both have a choice. We can let this destroy us, I can remain angry and hurt and you can be in denial, or we can face it head on, I accept the pain, you accept the punishment, and we move on. Your life is not over, you have decades of years ahead to rewrite your story. The world is huge, it is so much bigger than Palo Alto and Stanford, and you will make a space for yourself in it where you can be useful and happy. Right now your name is tainted, so I challenge you to make a new name for yourself, to do something so good for the world, it blows everyone away. You have a brain and a voice and a heart. Use them wisely. You possess immense love from your family. That alone can pull you out of anything. Mine has held me up through all of this. Yours will hold you and you will go on. I believe, that one day, you will understand all of this better. I hope you will become a better more honest person who can properly use this story to prevent another story like this from ever happening again. I fully support your journey to healing, to rebuilding your life, because that is the only way you’ll begin to help others. Now to address the sentencing. When I read the probation officer’s report, I was in disbelief, consumed by anger which eventually quieted down to profound sadness. My statements have been slimmed down to distortion and taken out of context. I fought hard during this trial and will not have the outcome minimized by a probation officer who attempted to evaluate my current state and my wishes in a fifteen minute conversation, the majority of which was spent answering questions I had about the legal system. The context is also important. Brock had yet to issue a statement, and I had not read his remarks. My life has been on hold for over a year, a year of anger, anguish and uncertainty, until a jury of my peers rendered a judgment that validated the injustices I had endured. Had Brock admitted guilt and remorse and offered to settle early on, I would have considered a lighter sentence, respecting his honesty, grateful to be able to move our lives forward. Instead he took the risk of going to trial, added insult to injury and forced me to relive the hurt as details about my personal life and sexual assault were brutally dissected before the public. He pushed me and my family through a year of inexplicable, unnecessary suffering, and should face the consequences of challenging his crime, of putting my pain into question, of making us wait so long for justice. I told the probation officer I do not want Brock to rot away in prison. I did not say he does not deserve to be behind bars. The probation officer’s recommendation of a year or less in county jail is a soft time-out, a mockery of the seriousness of his assaults, and of the consequences of the 11 pain I have been forced to endure. I also told the probation officer that what I truly wanted was for Brock to get it, to understand and admit to his wrongdoing. Unfortunately, after reading the defendant’s statement, I am severely disappointed and feel that he has failed to exhibit sincere remorse or responsibility for his conduct. I fully respected his right to a trial, but even after twelve jurors unanimously convicted him guilty of three felonies, all he has admitted to doing is ingesting alcohol. Someone who cannot take full accountability for his actions does not deserve a mitigating sentence. It is deeply offensive that he would try and dilute rape with a suggestion of promiscuity. By definition rape is the absence of promiscuity, rape is the absence of consent, and it perturbs me deeply that he can’t even see that distinction. The probation officer factored in that the defendant is youthful and has no prior convictions. In my opinion, he is old enough to know what he did was wrong. When you are eighteen in this country you can go to war. When you are nineteen, you are old enough to pay the consequences for attempting to rape someone. He is young, but he is old enough to know better. As this is a first offense I can see where leniency would beckon. On the other hand, as a society, we cannot forgive everyone’s first sexual assault or digital rape. It doesn’t make sense. The seriousness of rape has to be communicated clearly, we should not create a culture that suggests we learn that rape is wrong through trial and error. The consequences of sexual assault needs to be severe enough that people feel enough fear to exercise good judgment even if they are drunk, severe enough to be preventative. The fact that Brock was a star athlete at a prestigious university should not be seen as an entitlement to leniency, but as an opportunity to send a strong cultural message that sexual assault is against the law regardless of social class. The probation officer weighed the fact that he has surrendered a hard earned swimming scholarship. If I had been sexually assaulted by an un-athletic guy from a community college, what would his sentence be? If a first time offender from an underprivileged background was accused of three felonies and displayed no accountability for his actions other than drinking, what would his sentence be? How fast he swims does not lessen the impact of what happened to me. The Probation Officer has stated that this case, when compared to other crimes of similar nature, may be considered less serious due to the defendant’s level of intoxication. It felt serious. That’s all I’m going to say. He is a lifetime sex registrant. That doesn’t expire. Just like what he did to me doesn’t expire, doesn’t just go away after a set number of years. It stays with me, it’s part of my identity, it has forever changed the way I carry myself, the way I live the rest of my life. A year has gone by and he has had lots of time on his hands. Has he been seeing a psychologist? What has he done in this past year to show he’s been progressing?

Throughout incarceration I hope he is provided with appropriate therapy and resources to rebuild his life. I request that he educates himself about the issue of campus sexual assault. I hope he accepts proper punishment and pushes himself to reenter society as a better person.

To conclude, I want to say thank you. To everyone from the intern who made me oatmeal when I woke up at the hospital that morning, to the deputy who waited beside me, to the nurses who calmed me, to the detective who listened to me and never judged me, to my advocates who stood unwaveringly beside me, to my therapist who taught me to find courage in vulnerability, to my boss for being kind and understanding, to my incredible parents who teach me how to turn pain into strength, to my friends who remind me how to be happy, to my boyfriend who is patient and loving, to my unconquerable sister who is the other half of my heart, to Alaleh, my idol, who fought tirelessly and never doubted me. Thank you to everyone involved in the trial for their time and attention. Thank you to girls across the nation that wrote cards to my DA to give to me, so many strangers who cared for me. Most importantly, thank you to the two men who saved me, who I have yet to meet. I sleep with two bicycles that I drew taped above my bed to remind myself there are heroes in this story. That we are looking out for one another. To have known all of these people, to have felt their protection and love, is something I will never forget. And finally, to girls everywhere, I am with you. On nights when you feel alone, I am with you. When people doubt you or dismiss you, I am with you. I fought everyday for you. So never stop fighting, I believe you. Lighthouses don’t go running all over an island looking for boats to save; they just stand there shining. Although I can’t save every boat, I hope that by speaking today, you absorbed a small amount of light, a small knowing that you can’t be silenced, a small satisfaction that justice was served, a small assurance that we are getting somewhere, and a big, big knowing that you are important, unquestionably, you are untouchable, you are beautiful, you are to be valued, respected, undeniably, every minute of every day, you are powerful and nobody can take that away from you. To girls everywhere, I am with you. Thank yo

Trump as Dictator: He threatened to jail Hillary because of what she said about him.

http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/6/4/1534311/-Trump-threatens-HRC-w-prison-after-what-she-said-about-me?detail=facebook

He is sounding more and more like a dictator.
This is the stuff of which dangerous dictatorships are made.  Trump is now threatening to use criminal prosecution of Hillary as political revenge.  Twice on Friday I heard CBS radio network news reports on KCBS-AM in San Francisco, that Trump said that if he is elected, he will seek to have Hillary “prosecuted” and “jailed.”  The way he said it sounded clearly like a personal vendetta.  One of his statements came at a rally, the other in an interview for Face the Nation that airs this Sunday on CBS television.  I did some quick searching online (www.Startpage.com) to come up with more, below.
There is no overstating exactly how dangerous this is.
The use of the mechanisms of the law to “settle scores” between competing candidates for office, is something we think of as occurring in dictatorships far away, run by tyrants with thin skins, huge egos, and petty grudges.  I can’t recall an instance in at least a century when anything like it happened here.  Even Nixon’s “enemies list” did not include seeking to prosecute the opposing candidates in the 1968 and 1972 elections. 
And yet, here we are.
First, the item from the Face the Nation interview: www.cbsnews.com/...
[Face The Nation moderator] [John] Dickerson asked Trump whether he'd direct his attorney general to look into the matter, if he wins the presidency and the current probe into Clinton's server concludes with no indictment.
"I would certainly have my, very fair, but I would have my attorney general look at it," Trump said. "Yes, I would. Because everyone knows that she's guilty. Now, I would say this: she's guilty, but I would let my attorney general make that determination. Maybe they would disagree. And I would let that person make the determination."
Let’s see: “Everyone knows she’s guilty... but I would let my Attorney General make that determination...”  Do go on, Mr. Trump.
Next, from an article in USA Today:   www.usatoday.com/...
"Remember I said I was a counter-puncher?" an animated Trump asked an enthusiastic crowd of supporters at a rally in San Jose, Calif. "After what she said about me today in her phony speech — that was a phony speech, that was a Donald Trump hit job — I will say this, Hillary Clinton has to go to jail. She's guilty as hell."   ...Trump also left open the possibility that his own attorney general would investigate her emails if he became president.
That language is as clear as day:  “I (am) a counter-puncher.  After what she said about me... I will say this, Hillary Clinton has to go to jail.” 
This is new.
For a while now, Trump has been threatening to have Hillary prosecuted for the email stuff.  But after Hillary’s speech last week, that, to put it mildly, tore him a new one, Trump’s threats have gotten personal.

Oregon Road Trip: 900 Miles of unique beauty

http://thatoregonlife.com/2016/06/road-trip-900-miles-must-see-spots-eastern-oregon/


I hope to do this trip this coming summer.

Saturday, June 4, 2016

A guy flies in a Wingsuit - I would not try this

http://unofficialnetworks.com/2016/06/viral-alert-stabilized-wingsuit-footage-gets-1million-hits-in-a-day


We have all seen tons of wingsuit footage but a simple stabilization plugin used in post production gives an all new insight into just how nimble these flyers are as they weave in and out of obstructions at incredible speed. It’s kinda hard to comprehend and almost looks CG. They just set a new standard for proximity flight videos.

Bill Maher: New Rule: Socialism vs Capitalism - An Explanation for Republicans

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2016/06/04/bill-maher-explains-socialism-to-republicans-and-its-hilarious-video/


Bill Maher Explains Socialism To Republicans And It’s Hilarious (VIDEO)

Until recently, “socialism” has been one of the dirtiest words someone could say in the United States. On Friday, Bill Maher slammed the “free market is always right” crowd, saying that it is the time that people begin to recognize that capitalism is a shark that devours everything in its path.
“Since this year’s election features both a socialist and a bonafide capitalist pig, someone needs to explain to the ‘free market solves everything’ crowd that when it comes to socialism, you’re soaking in it,” Maher says at the beginning of the segment.
“Someone needs to explain to the free-market crowd that when it comes to socialism, you’re soaking in it. So many Americans hate the word ‘socialism’ but love the concept: Medicare, unemployment, disability, farm subsidies. Forget the transgender debate. What America really needs is a separate bathroom for welfare queens.”
Maher then goes on to skewer Republicans who speak out against socialism, such as Marco Rubio. Who, as Maher quips, happens to be a representative from Florida, where everyone goes when they retire to live off from social security.
“It’s eaten our democracy. It’s eating our middle class. It’s eaten our health care system, our prison system, our news media. It’s even eaten our food systems so thoroughly that a lot of our food is no longer something that should be eaten.”
Maher then goes on to talk about capitalism’s next big target—national parks. Yes, not even our national parks are safe from capitalism’s voracious appetite. Due to an 11-million-dollar hole in the budget, naming rights for national parks will now be sold.
So get ready to load up the family for a vacation this summer to Hooters Grand Teton national park.

RIP Champ: 10 Knockouts by Muhammad Ali

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_fEIVwjrew


You were THE GREATEST in the ring and with your standing up for the rights of people.
RIP Muhammad

Muhammad Ali died yesterday! Muhammad speaks.

I used to watch any and every fight Muhammad fought in when I was a kid.  I was on a boxing team.

Muhammad asks:  Why was Jesus White?  What happened to the black angels?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtxfTEyJZg4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6igy7hmildM

America's Homegrown Domestic Terrorists are more dangerous to the US than ISIL. (The extreme Right feel emboldened by Trump)

http://www.alternet.org/belief/domestic-extremists-greater-threat-isis?akid=14323.294211.xCZtT0&rd=1&src=newsletter1057755&t=12


America's Homegrown Domestic Extremists Pose a Greater Danger Than ISIS Ever Will

Far-right groups consider anti-government violence justified, and Trump's nomination has only emboldened them.

Take America back from those who have stolen it.
Protect America from those who want to destroy it.
Restore the principles that these usurpers betrayed.
These are the messages that have defined the GOP presidential race. They have been used for the past eight years to justify obstruction of the Obama administration, and are now being used to paint the democratic candidates as dangerous. In the late stages of the GOP primary as the rhetoric became increasingly xenophobic, they were applied to increasingly broad swaths of the American population as well.
Years of constant repetition by members of the GOP have given them an appearance of legitimacy, now strengthened by Donald Trump’s victory in the GOP primary contest and the party’s growing embrace of him as their standard-bearer.
Unfortunately, the Republican Party isn’t alone in using these messages.
Right-wing extremist groups use them as well, and to very specific ends: to define the conditions under which antigovernment violence becomes legitimate in their worldview.

The Cost of the Wall with Mexico figured out - Deep Pockets are needed for a HUUUGGE WALL

https://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/8/31/1416884/-So-President-Trump-you-want-a-Great-Great-Wall-let-s-look-at-the-numbers?detail=facebook


So, President Trump, you want a Great Great Wall... let's look at the numbers
Fun fact: the US/Mexico border is 1,954 miles long.
Fun fact: the Great Wall of China contained about 3,889 miles of actual wall - we don't want to count the 1,500+ miles of trenches or rivers. No sir, nothing but real wall for us.
So our Great Great Wall will be just a few miles less than 1/2 the length of the Great Wall. That shouldn't be a problem - certainly less difficult than building a 95 story skyscraper... after all, our Dear Leader told us that long ago.
Big question: how high should we build our Great Great Wall?
Hmmm, former Arizona governor Janet Napolitano was famous for saying: "Show me a 50 foot wall and I'll show you a 51 foot ladder."
Poppycock, I tell you! She should have checked: the tallest ladder for sale at Home Depot in Mexico is 40 feet tall. That means there is no such thing as a 51 foot ladder in Mexico.
So we'll make our wall 50 feet tall just to be safe.
Next up, we know these pesky Mexicans just love to dig tunnels - remember El Chapo? So we need to dig our Great Great Wall in deep. Let's go for 30 feet, and we'll put some surprises down at the base for anyone who thinks they can get past us. We'll add the caveat that we only have to dig until we hit bedrock, so we might save some digging there.
In order for our wall to be not just great but Great Great, it's gonna have to be thick, too.  We'll do the detail design later - after our (soon-to-be) Maximum Leader for Life appoints a Great Great Manager for the project - but for now, let's just go for a round number..... 10 feet.
Let's do a SWAG (Scientific Wild Ass Guess) and a ROM (Rough Order of Magnitude) to see what we're looking at for this project.
We've got dimensions: 80 feet high from the bottom of the foundation and 10 feet wide. That's 800 square feet of cross-section, but concrete is sold in cubic yards, so let's see how much we need:
800 square feet / 9 feet per yard = 89 square yards cross-section
1760 yards per mile * 1954 miles = 3439040 yards
3,439,040 yards * 89 square yards = 306,074,560 cubic yards of concrete needed
For reference, the Hoover Dam contains 3,250,000 cubic yards of concrete.

Bundy Terrorists tried to have Charges dismissed but THE CHARGES STAND.

http://www.oregonlive.com/oregon-standoff/2016/06/federal_judge_charges_of_consp.html


Charges of conspiracy to impede federal officers at the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, and firearms possession in a federal facility will stand against the indicted Oregon standoff defendants headed to trial this fall or later, U.S. District Judge Anna J. Brown has ruled.
The judge's decisions follow legal arguments last month in which defense lawyers had urged the court to dismiss the allegations, contending they were unconstitutionally vague or broad, or that the federal government did not have jurisdiction over the wildlife sanctuary in eastern Oregon.
In written orders filed Friday, the judge dismissed those defense motions. Brown, though, has yet to rule on the third count of the federal indictments – using and carrying a firearm in the course of a crime of violence - considered the most tenuous of the charges filed.

Friday, June 3, 2016

Michelle Obama makes Trump look foolish at her Commencement Speech.

http://www.politicususa.com/2016/06/03/michelle-obama-annihilates-trump-gops-bad-week-lot-worse.html


While speaking at the CCNY commencement ceremony, First Lady Obama said:
Some folks out there today seem to have a very different perspective. They seem to view our diversity as a threat to be contained rather than as a resource to be tapped. They tell us to be afraid of those who are different, to be suspicious of those with whom we disagree. They act as if name-calling is an acceptable substitute for thoughtful debate. As if anger and intolerance should be our default state rather than optimism and openness that have always been the engine of our progress.
But graduates, I can tell you that as First Lady, I have had the privilege of traveling around the world, and visiting dozens of different countries, and I have seen what happens when ideas like these take hold. I have seen how leaders rule by intimidation, leaders who demonize and dehumanize entire groups of people often do so because they have nothing else to offer. And I have seen how places that stifle the voices and dismiss the potential of their citizens are diminished, how they are less vital, less hopeful, less free.
Graduates that is not who we are. That is not what this country stands for. No, no, here in America, we don’t let our differences tear us apart. Not here. Because we know that our greatness comes from when we appreciate each other’s strengths, when we learn from each other, when we lean on each other, because in this country, it’s never been each person for themselves, no we’re all in this together. We always have been. And here in America, we don’t give in to our fears. We don’t up walls to keep people out because we know that our greatness has always depended on contributions from people who were born elsewhere.
First Lady Obama’s remarks are the biggest sign yet that all of the White House is ready to join the fight to defeat Donald Trump.
Michelle Obama’s strong remarks added to the growing woes of the Republican Party. The GOP now has a nominee that has attacked the judicial system while facing fraud suits in the two biggest states in the country. As if this wasn’t enough to keep Republicans awake at night, the popular President and First Lady have signaled that they are gearing up to join the 2016 fight.

Paul Ryan blasts Trump for racial comments about the Judge in TRUMP U case. (Ryan just supported Trump yesterday)

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/paul-ryan-trump-university-judge-223876?cmpid=sf


Fresh off his endorsement of Donald Trump, House Speaker Paul Ryan returned to questioning the Republican nominee’s rhetoric Friday.
Unprompted by WISN radio host Vicki McKenna, Ryan criticized Trump’s racially-based attacks against the federal judge in California overseeing a civil fraud lawsuit against Trump University. Trump has argued that U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel’s Mexican heritage creates, "an inherent conflict of interest,” a position Ryan said he cannot support.
Story Continued Below
“Look, the comment about the judge the other day just was out of left field for my mind,” Ryan said. “It’s reasoning I don’t relate to. I completely disagree with the thinking behind that. And so, he clearly says and does things I don’t agree with, and I’ve had to speak up from time to time when that has occurred, and I’ll continue to do that if it’s necessary. I hope it’s not.”
Ryan wasn't the only one calling Trump out. Moments later on CNN, paid contributor and Trump surrogate Kayleigh McEnany called him "off-base to bring up the judge's heritage." McEnany added that Curiel "should not be disqualified for that alone. If he wants to bring up a bias accusation, he has every right to do that."


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/paul-ryan-trump-university-judge-223876#ixzz4AY3plmx2 
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook




Trump: Crisis Situations created by a Trump Presidency: Much is as stake

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/06/2016-donald-trump-international-foreign-policy-global-risk-security-guide-213936?cmpid=sf


To hear Hillary Clinton tell it, letting Donald J. Trump anywhere near the Oval Office would be tantamount to inviting a nuclear apocalypse. The address she delivered from San Diego Thursday opened up a new front in the 2016 campaign: whether Trump can be trusted as leader of the free world. Calling Trump’s ideas “dangerously incoherent,” she presented herself a sure-handed, sober-minded alternative to the erratic billionaire. “He is not just unprepared,” she said, “he is temperamentally unfit to hold an office that requires knowledge, stability and immense responsibility.”
It’s powerful political rhetoric, and Trump is certainly an unknown quantity—perhaps even a radical disruption to the current order. But what are the actual global risks that a Trump presidency would pose?
Story Continued Below
His campaign has already raised any number of potentially destabilizing questions. Might President Trump send U.S. ground troops after ISIL? Confront Vladimir Putin, or let him run loose? Sanction Mexico or Japan? Bomb China’s artificial islands in the South China Sea? Wage trade war on China? Attack Iran or North Korea? Would he tear up existing trade deals? Pull the U.S. out of NATO if allies don’t pay more? Use U.S. debt as negotiating leverage? What risks might any or all of these actions pose for Americans?
My firm, Eurasia Group, specializes in analyzing large-scale global hazards, and each year we publish a list of what we see as the top geopolitical risks of the year. This year, there is so much uncertainty surrounding a Trump presidency that I’ve worked with Politico Magazine to apply this model to the specific question of a Trump presidency, with the goal of separating sound arguments from hype, and looking at the full-risk implications of a Trump foreign policy.
Mapping those implications is a challenge, in part because Trump’s habit of issuing contradictory statements on the campaign trail make it tough to predict what he would actually do in office. Both Trump and Clinton are shrewdly evasive candidates, but Clinton’s tenure as Barack Obama’s secretary of state gives her a clear track record we can study. She also has a campaign website that offers detailed foreign policy proposals. Trump has no foreign policy history and few clearly stated plans. It’s also much easier to guess whom Clinton might invite to join her team, and who might accept. Not so for Trump on either count; he has alienated much of the Republican foreign-policy establishment, depriving him of a reservoir of expertise he would normally be able to rely on.
Compounding the problem, Trump’s positions change pretty quickly. Clinton flip-flops as well, but her shifts develop more slowly than Trump’s and involve carefully crafted, if sometimes convoluted, justifications. Trump’s are a magician’s quicker-than-the-eye sleight of hand, and they often come with little or no explanation. Would Trump really try to ban all Muslims from entering the United States? That was a pledge, and then it was a “suggestion.” How could this ban be legal? How would it be enforced? He hasn’t said, and his supporters don’t seem to care.
That said, we have to assume that Trump’s “America First” philosophy will guide his choices. That’s a term I bear some responsibility for: When I observed earlier this spring that Trump’s worldview amounted to an “America First” foreign policy, I didn’t mean it as a compliment, and I was startled to see him grab that label with both hands. In addition, Trump prides himself on being a tough negotiator, and he wants to show U.S. taxpayers and foreign governments that he’s no chump.

What would a Trump presidency mean for the worl

He won’t be guided by ideology. He doesn’t appear to have one. He’s a gut-feel guy, a zero-sum strategist, and a bottom-line businessman. He won’t approach problems as if the world’s sole superpower can afford to be generous, to do more so that others can do less. He sees no special responsibility to be magnanimous, or even patient. Being No. 1 doesn’t mean playing the role of provider. It's about winning. It means being the toughest, smartest son of a bitch at the table. In short, Trump will probably try to remake U.S. foreign policy in his own (self-)image.
One caveat: I think Trump is unlikely to be president. A Democratic Party more unified after its convention will probably generate enough votes to lift Hillary Clinton to victory. And the nuclear threat, though it tops many people's list of visceral fears, is the ultimate red herring: Trump himself may be reckless, but we're well past the days of the Cold War and Cuban Missile Crisis. That's well outside what even he would be willing to gamble on.
But that doesn’t mean we can afford to dismiss the risks of a Trump foreign policy. He has hit on a message that resonates with millions of Americans, and it won’t be easy for future presidential candidates, of either party, to ignore the electoral potential of this formula. Even if Trump falls short, his America First approach to foreign policy deserves a close look because it will survive his candidacy. And if he does manage to pull of the upset, the implications of an America First foreign policy directed by Trump himself will be far reaching.
Here are the “Trump Top Risks,” the most worrisome implications of a Trump foreign policy, and a few red herrings we won’t need to worry about.
1. The Bolt from the Blue
Despite their best-laid plans, all presidents face storms they didn’t expect. For Bill Clinton it was the war in Yugoslavia. George W. Bush had 9/11. Barack Obama got the Arab Spring, a civil war in Syria, and the conflict in Ukraine. What’s the best way to handle the unexpected? In an off-the-record briefing with reporters in 2014, President Obama described his foreign policy doctrine as “Don’t do stupid stuff,” a “first, do-no-harm” approach to crisis management. “Don’t do stupid stuff is not an organizing principle,” as Hillary Clinton later noted, but it can help presidents avoid making a bad situation worse.
With Trump, the biggest risk comes from the way he’d handle a crisis that no one saw coming, whether from China, Putin, North Korea, a cyberattack, terrorists, or something else. As a candidate, he thrives on surprise. Restraint and strategic patience don’t figure among his strengths, and Trump might well respond to a bolt-from-the-blue crisis with a shot of bravado, a threat of escalation and tactics designed to keep antagonists, and maybe U.S. allies, off guard.
In addition to the risk of what will actually happen in a crisis, his approach creates another kind of risk, one that exists even without a crisis to trigger it. An improvised foreign policy based on maintaining the element of surprise might make policymakers and a few citizens feel more powerful, but it invites rivals and enemies to test U.S. intentions to find out what Washington will and will not defend. A clear policy, and predictable outcomes, help shape the behavior of the world’s bad actors. Mixed signals and big surprises, on the other hand, increase the risk of miscalculation on all sides—and increase the chances the U.S. will be provoked.
2. The Dollar


Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/06/2016-donald-trump-international-foreign-policy-global-risk-security-guide-213936#ixzz4AWq3eOia 
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

Thursday, June 2, 2016

New Jersey Newspaper writes editorial tearing up Donald Trump

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/06/new-jersey-newspaper-torpedoes-trump-he-doesnt-respect-democracy-now-why-would-he-as-president/


nald Trump could have stood with veterans the day after Memorial Day, praised them, and finally handed over a check for the money he'd promised but so far failed to give them.
 
He could have pitched their cause as worthy of more support, and highlighted their suicide rate, their struggle to find good jobs. Their suffering from PTSD and brain damage.
 
All that would have been presidential. Yet for a man who professes to care, Trump said precious little about veterans on Tuesday. Instead, he made this news conference entirely about himself. His persecution complex was on full display as he unloaded a blistering tirade on the press.
Trump says he raised $5.6M for vets, blasts 'dishonest political press'
 
The original reason Trump set out to do his January fundraiser, you'll recall, was because he didn't want to attend a Fox News debate and face questions from Megyn Kelly. Now he thinks he shouldn't have to face any questions about the money he promised to raise for veterans, either.
 
He hurled personal insults at reporters for daring to ask how much he was contributing, and to whom -- calling one a "sleaze," and saying the news media "make me look very bad."
 
He claimed the real reason he spent months dodging their questions is that he's not looking for credit. (This was after Trump bragged on national television about the millions he'd raised for veterans, and posed with two giant $100,000 checks).
 
Then, hours after Trump finally disclosed the actual dollar amounts and charities, the Associated Press called all 41 groups and spoke with more than two-dozen. It discovered about half the checks he wrote were dated the same day the Washington Post ran a story questioning whether he'd distributed all of the money.
Trump wants to kill Wall Street reform. Here's why that scares us.
 
Which raises an obvious question: Did Trump have to be publicly shamed into making his contribution?
 
This is the basic stuff of political reporting -- not to mention that the candidate in question already faces allegations of fraud in federal court. We've heard convincing testimony that what officials did at Trump University was a scam. 

Trump is getting his Butt Kicked by a woman!! Hillary talks about the disaster that is Trump!

http://www.politicususa.com/2016/06/02/hillary-clinton-turned-trump-national-joke-epic-foreign-policy-smack.html


Hillary Clinton didn’t just deliver a foreign policy speech. Former Sec. Clinton turned Trump into a national joke who can’t be trusted with the presidency.
Clinton said:
This is not someone who should ever have the nuclear codes because it’s not hard to imagine Donald Trump leading us into a war just because somebody got under his very thin skin. We cannot put the security of our children and grandchildren into Donald Trump’s hands. We cannot let him roll the dice with America.
This is a man who said more countries should have nuclear weapons including Saudi Arabia. This is someone who has threatened to abandon our allies in NATO. The countries who work with us to root out terrorists abroad before they strike us at home. He believes we can treat the US economy like one of his casinos, and default on our debts to the rest of the world, which would cause an economic catastrophe far worse than anything we experienced in 2008.
He has said he would order our military to carry out torture and the murder of civilians who are related to suspected terrorists, even though, those are war crimes. He says he doesn’t have to listen to our generals, our admirals, our ambassadors and other high officials because he has, “a very good brain.”
He also said I know more about ISIS than the generals do. Believe me. You know what? I don’t believe him. He says climate change is a hoax invented by the Chinese. And he has the gall to say that prisoners of war like John McCain aren’t heroes. He praises dictators like Vladamir Putin and picks fights with our friends like the British Prime Minister, the Mayor of London, the German chancellor, the president of Mexico, and the Pope.
He says he has foreign policy experience because he ran the Miss Universe pageant in Russia. And to top it off, he believes that America is weak, an embarrassment. He said we are “a third world country.” And he’s been saying things like that for decades. Those are the words my friends of someone who doesn’t understand America or the world, and they’re the words of someone who would lead us in the wrong direction.
Clinton launched a complete and comprehensive argument against Trump. The argument that she is making goes right to the heart of what Trump is campaigning on. Trump wants people to vote for his personality, so Clinton is exposing his personality as unfit for the White House.

Trump's Empire Continues to Implode

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/06/01/1533408/-LOL-Another-Swing-And-A-Miss-Trump-s-Empire-Continues-To-Crumble?detail=email&link_id=13&can_id=fe4020b37f6b0a9909f482166cdbbdf9&source=email-sheriff-joe-arpaio-guilty-of-perjury-judge-to-refer-case-for-criminal-prosecution&email_referrer=sheriff-joe-arpaio-guilty-of-perjury-judge-to-refer-case-for-criminal-prosecution___74213&email_subject=in-six-days-history-will-be-made


Well, Trump and his moronic racism just killed a 54 year old American tradition at The Blue Monster, a golf club he spent $254M to buy just 4 years ago. The PGA is moving the World Golf Championships to Mexico, because of course! (No pun intended). The tournament was supposed to be at Trump’s course through 2023, and no doubt that was a big part of why he bought it, but the PGA took advantage of a clause in the contract to flee Trump’s taint when they claimed they couldn't “find” a sponsor (yeah, I'm really sure they couldn't find one racist CEO in America willing to pony up).
The PGA Tour announced that it was ending a 54-year relationship with Doral, which Trump bought in 2012 and spent $250 million renovating, because it could not find a sponsor to replace Cadillac, whose contract ran out this year…
The tour has spent a year trying to find a replacement for Cadillac, and it became more difficult as Trump gained notoriety with his caustic comments during his presidential campaign. That began with Trump’s announcement that he was running, when he said Mexico was sending its unwanted people to the United States, and that in many cases they were “criminals, drug dealers, rapists.”
Trump lashed out in what by now is just classless par for the course (pun intended):
"They’re moving it to Mexico City, which, by the way, I hope they have kidnapping insurance."
But more seriously, it sounds to me like any businesspeople involved with Trump better invest in bigot insurance, like the PGA was smart enough to do.

Expand Social Security now says President Obama

http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/6/2/1533532/-President-Obama-calls-for-expanding-Social-Security?detail=email&link_id=10&can_id=fe4020b37f6b0a9909f482166cdbbdf9&source=email-sheriff-joe-arpaio-guilty-of-perjury-judge-to-refer-case-for-criminal-prosecution&email_referrer=sheriff-joe-arpaio-guilty-of-perjury-judge-to-refer-case-for-criminal-prosecution___74213&email_subject=in-six-days-history-will-be-made

In perhaps the clearest sign that not just the Democratic Party, but the nation as a whole have become more receptive to a progressive position, President Obama spoke out on Wednesday in favor of expanding Social Security benefits.
"It is time we finally made Social Security more generous and increase the benefits so that today’s retirees and future generations get the dignified retirement that they have earned," Obama said in Elkhart, Indiana, during a speech in which he spoke against Republican economic policies.
With the great majority of workers no longer eligible for pension plans, and most workers forced to depend on 401K plans that have produced returns far lower than expected, a “dignified retirement” seems to constantly recede from many Americans. In 1960, more than a third of all elderly Americans lived in poverty but the poverty rate fell sharply from 1960 to 1995 as Social Security provided exactly the kind of buffer it had been designed to create. However, since then the poverty rate as once again began to tick up as more Americans face retirement without pensions and Social Security benefits have been too small to address the gap.
Both Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders have called for an increase in Social Security. This is a significant change from the last two presidential cycles, when Republicans treated Social Security as a “failed program,” and Democrats were on the defensive. In 2011, President Obama offered a deal to Republicans that would have cut Social Security benefits as part of a Grand Bargain. As with nearly everything in the last eight years, Republicans rebuffed Obama’s offer. That offer is clearly no longer on the table.
"Retirement insecurity is an obvious problem for middle- and low-income families and both Social Security and Medicare are highly efficient programs," said Jared Bernstein, a former Obama White House economic adviser and now a senior fellow at the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. "It took a while, but I think Democrats have come to realize that defending, strengthening, and even expanding these security-enhancing programs is what makes them Democrats.”
Even Donald Trump has said that he wouldn’t cut Social Security. Though that may not mean much.



Trump has split the GOP

http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/how-disintegration-gop-created-trump?akid=14316.294211.eWUvMo&rd=1&src=newsletter1057551&t=10


There are mainstream Republicans who are opting out, more than people may realize. The Stop Trump Movement boasts some major players in the GOP scene, people like Mitt Romney, George Will, Erick Erickson, David Brooks and Glenn Beck to name just a few. Some are attempting to salvage their futures by contending that Trump is unacceptable only because he is a traitor to conservatism, which he is in some ways although that is hardly the primary case against him. The more valiant among them take the threat of Trump seriously and are willing to admit the truth, such as Bret Stephens of the Wall Street Journal who told Fareed Zakaria over the weekend:
"I most certainly will not vote for Donald Trump. I will vote for the least left wing opponent to Donald Trump and I will want to make a vote that will make sure he is the biggest loser in presidential history since Alf Landon or going back further. It’s important that Donald Trump and what he represents, this 'ethnic conservatism or populism' be so decisively rebuked that the Republican party and Republican voters will forever learn their lesson that they cannot nominate a man so manifestly unqualified to be president in any way shape or form."
Stephens is a traditional ideological conservative who could rail against Trump’s defense of Social Security or his anti-free trade tirades if he chose to. But except for a passing reference to “populism” Stephens indicts Trump on the right grounds: his manifest unfitness for the job. Finally, here’s something that liberals and conservatives can agree upon.
There are a few conservatives who saw the disintegration of their party coming for quite a while, notably conservative writer and former Bush speechwriter David Frum who has been committing apostasy for several years now. He wrotea thought-provoking piece for The Atlantic this week in which he documents how Donald Trump has broken seven standards and norms of behavior that make it possible for democracy to function.

Wednesday, June 1, 2016

Hillary rips Trump a new one today: This is GREAT! (Trump is unfit to be President)

http://www.politicususa.com/2016/06/01/hillary-clinton-annihilates-trump-truth-bomb-calling-unqualified-unfit-fraud.html


The gloves are off, and Hillary Clinton delivered a one-two punch to Donald Trump in New Jersey that called out the Republican nominee as a scammer and a fraud who is unqualified and unfit to hold office.
Every day we learn more about Donald Trump. Just yesterday, we learned the truth about Donald Trump’s big talk about helping veterans. It turns out it wasn’t until the press shamed him that he actually made the donations that he promised. For months, it was all just a publicity stunt.
Well today, we’re learning about another scam. The so-called Trump University. The New York Attorney General is suing Trump for fraud, and his own employees testified that Trump U, you can’t make this up, that Trump U was a fraudulent scheme where Donald Trump enriched himself at the expense of hard working people. Trump and his employees took advantage of vulnerable Americans encouraging them to max out their credit cards, empty their retirement savings, destroy their financial futures all while making promises they knew were false from the beginning.
….

This is just more evidence that Donald Trump himself is a fraud. He is trying to scam America the way he scammed all these people at Trump U. It’s important that we recognize what he has done because that’s usually a pretty good indicator of what he will do. And on issue after issue, we someone who is unqualified and unfit to be the President Of The United States.



Trump Wants Revenge: As President he could get back at his enemies

http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/trumps-campaign-based-revenge?akid=14312.294211.8Saure&rd=1&src=newsletter1057458&t=6


Increasingly, the evidence is pointing to a certain conclusion: Donald Trump is running for president because he believes the power and fame of the White House will allow him to settle the score in his ever-expanding list of petty grievances.
Sure, there are other things he likes about it, like the attention and the opportunity to slap the word “Trump” in gold lettering across the front of the desk in the Oval Office, are motivating factors. But for those who have been following the campaign closely, it’s hard to ignore the fact that Trump spends much, perhaps most of his time, honing an enemies list of people he imagines have personally slighted him and fantasizing out loud about putting them and anyone he associates with them in their place.
Farah Stockman and Keith Bradsher of  The New York Times published a piece Monday detailing a major grudge that Trump holds against a group of Chinese investors that helped save him from a financial crisis in the ’90s. He made a lucrative deal with this group of Hong Kong billionaires to sell them the Bank of America building on Avenue of the Americas, allowing him 30% of the profits and paying him feeds to develop the building. In 2005, they sold the building for $1.76 billion.
“Although it was believed to be the largest residential real estate transaction in the city’s history,” Stockman and Bradsher write, “Mr. Trump was furious, and contends to this day that his partners did not consult him first.”
Trump claims he was mad because he thinks he could have gotten a better deal, a claim that’s even those completely ignorant of real estate economics can see is self-serving nonsense. Still, he sued the men who had saved him from financial ruin, making wild accusations and tying them up in court for years.
He lost the lawsuit, but now runs around telling audiences he won it, portraying the portion of the building he owns, which was what he settled for after his loss, as if he “got from China in a war.”
He mentions this deal, pretending he won when he lost, during his many campaign tirades portraying China as some kind of economic predator that will stop at nothing to destroy the American economy, saying, “we are being ripped so badly by China” and that they are out to “rape our country” and that our trade deficit is “the greatest theft in the history of the world”.
It’s a bizarre obsession, but this New York Times story suggests that his paranoia could be the direct result of his personal vendetta against a group of Hong Kong billionaires that he sued because he wasn’t asked to sit in on their sales meetings.

Yesterday (Tuesday) was a terrible, No Good, Rotten Day for the GOP!

http://www.forwardprogressives.com/theres-no-way-to-spin-it-tuesday-was-rather-embarrassing-for-republicans/

Well, Tuesday was one of those days for Republicans. Let’s start with Donald Trump’s rather disastrous press conference concerning money he claims to have raised for veterans groups. First, he literally tried to claim that he wanted to keep his fundraising for vets “private,” which is a lie so laughably ridiculous it’s unbelievable that people didn’t bust out laughing the moment he said it. This is someone who specifically organized a “fundraiser for vets” as a political stunt to shield him from criticism following his decision to skip a GOP presidential debate because he was scared to face off against Fox News’ Megyn Kelly. Not only was this spectacle a clear exploitation of veterans to mask his own cowardice, but he scheduled the televised event to begin at the start of the debate itself. To say nothing about the numerous references to the event he’s made over the last several months. Then he basically threw a public hissy fit because he’s not exactly the biggest fan of the First Amendment. You see, Trump apparently believes the media should be nothing more than lap dogs and cheerleaders instead of fact-checkers and people who ask him tough questions. When they do the latter, he calls them “nasty,” “unfair” and whines endlessly about them. Oh, and we still aren’t really sure how much he actually raised. In other news coming from the land of Drumpf, 381 pages of documents were made public relating to Trump University that exposed the whole thing as nothing more than a sleazy scam aimed at conning people out of thousands of dollars. But enough about Trump. It was also announced on Tuesday that prominent conservative media personality Glenn Beck was suspended by SiriusXM and could be cancelled altogether after one of his guests, conservative author Brad Thor, seemingly suggested that someone should use “Second Amendment remedies” on Donald Trump if he were to be elected president. Then there was, perhaps, the saddest news of the day. In case you hadn’t heard, often completely delusional conservative pundit Bill Kristol has been one of the most well-known faces of the “#NeverTrump” movement of Republicans who claim they’re going to do whatever they can to stop Trump from becoming president. For a few weeks there have been rumors that these anti-Trump Republicans were going to mount some sort of third-party campaign against “The Donald.” At one point, Mitt Romney’s name had been tossed around as a potential candidate — someone who would have definitely had a profound impact on Trump’s chances. Well, we now know the “big name” individual who these folks are looking at as the “earth shattering candidate” who could take down Donald Trump: David French.

Read more at: http://www.forwardprogressives.com/theres-no-way-to-spin-it-tuesday-was-rather-embarrassing-for-republicans/