Why does the economy DO BETTER UNDER DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTS? The debate question not answered.

http://egbertowillies.com/2015/11/11/an-inconvenient-truth-republicans-would-not-address-in-the-debate-video/?utm_campaign=coschedule&utm_source=facebook_page&utm_medium=EgbertoWillies.com&utm_content=An%20inconvenient%20truth%20Republicans%20would%20not%20address%20in%20the%20debate%20(VIDEO)

Gerard Baker articulated an inconvenient truth to Carly Fiorina. In effect, it is a fact that the economy does better under Democratic presidencies than under Republican presidencies. Carly responded with a rather nonsensical answer.

Gerard Baker: Ms. Fiorina, while you’ve all pointed out how weak the current recovery has been and how disappointing by any historical standards, in the general election, the Democrats will inevitably ask you and voters to compare the recent president’s jobs performance. Now, in seven years under President Obama, the U.S. has added an average of 107,000 jobs a month. Under President Clinton, the economy added about 240,000 jobs a month. Under George W. Bush, it was only 13,000 a month. If you win the nomination, you’ll probably be facing a Democrat named Clinton. How are you going to respond to the claim that Democratic presidents are better at creating jobs than Republicans?