iHstorical comparisons are a tricky
business, and wrong examples teach dangerous lessons. Take loose
comparisons between this government shutdown and the previous 17.
Nate Silver and others
suggest that this shutdown will not harm the Republican Party because
the last one cost them only two house seats. More controversially, the
sheer number of previous shutdowns legitimates this one as a political tactic. If there were 17 recently, what makes one more so awful?
This
shutdown has no precedent in living memory. Our recent ones concerned
budget disputes, new legislation, or substantive restrictions on the
allocation of money. Now, Republicans seek to repeal a statute, a
statute that has been exhaustively legitimated through all political
channels, including a Supreme Court ruling, two presidential campaigns,
and 41 failed repeal attempts by House Republicans. To understand our
current crisis, we must travel back more than a century. In 1879, the
Democrats threatened to defund the federal government unless Republican
President Rutherford B. Hayes repealed laws protecting the right of
freed slaves to vote against the use of terror and violence by groups
like the Ku Klux Klan. The Democrats' threats backfired, and Republicans
swept to victory in election of 1880. The parallel should serve as a
warning to today's conservative obstructionists that their tactics are
self-defeating and illegitimate.
Like health care today, in 1879 the issue at stake was subject to
ferocious public contestation. The Enforcement Acts had put teeth in the
15th Amendment, which guaranteed that the right to vote would not be
denied on the basis of race.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/cafe/today-s-budget-brinksmanship-takes-cues-from-1879-s-ku-klux-klan
No comments:
Post a Comment