Those sumbitches gutted the Voting Rights Act. I do not care what shiny face anybody tries to put on it, the opinion is an egg-suckin’ dog.
http://juanitajean.com/2013/06/25/the-supremes-2/
Maddow blog has more:
MSNBC's Chris Hayes described
the decision as "one of the most stunning exercises in 'judicial
activism' ever," and it's an important point. While "judicial activism"
is generally an unfortunate euphemism used by ideologues to mean
"rulings I don't like," in this case, it has real merit. The people's
elected representatives in Congress approved the Voting Rights Act, then
re-approved it on three separate occasions, each with large bipartisan
majorities. It's received the support of several presidents, also
elected by the people, from both parties. This morning, five justices
effectively declared, "The principles are legally sound, but we don't
like where you're applying those principles." This really isn't what the
federal judiciary is supposed to do, vetoing parts of laws they deem
ideologically unsatisfying.
http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/06/25/19133249-supreme-court-strikes-down-part-of-voting-rights-act
No comments:
Post a Comment