Obama learned from Iraq and Afghanistan that US military intervention in
the Middle East doesn’t actually work very well. Iraq is still a
security basket case, with over 400 dead in bombings and attacks in
April (nowhere near the high of 3000 a month in 2006 when the US was in
charge of security, or even as much as contemporary Mexico, where over 1,000 a month have been dying in the drug war —
but still no paradise). It has been 11 years and we are still stuck in
Afghanistan, nor have we “stood up” a credible Afghan government.
Sen. John McCain argues for an aerial intervention, which more or less worked in Libya. But Syria is not like Libya in any way.
Syria’s weapons depots, tanks and artillery are not out in some
desert where they can be bombed with few casualties. They are in the
cities. Bombing them would kill a lot of innocent civilians. Even just
trying to take out the large number of anti-aircraft batteries (the
essential first step of any aerial intervention) would be very costly in
lives.
http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/obama-has-good-reason-not-intervene-syria?akid=10393.294211.79rLkn&rd=1&src=newsletter834395&t=21
No comments:
Post a Comment