Juneau, AK, The Long Winter

Sunrise in Juneau the morning of 8/2010: This is Douglas Harbor, Alaska.

Subscribe To

Posts
Atom
Posts
All Comments
Atom
All Comments

Thursday, February 23, 2017

President Bannon told Cpac he was committed to destroying the Government

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/23/steve-bannon-cpac-rare-public-address-west-wing-power-trump-adviser?CMP=edit_2221


here’s a reason why political operators like Steve Bannon have never sat on the national security council that effectively decides whether the United States should go to war. It’s the same reason why Bannon’s new seat on the NSC is such a threat to the security of the United States and its allies: because he’s permanently at war.
“I can run a little hot on occasions,” he admitted at the conservative freak show known as the CPAC conference. Judging from his rare public outing on Thursday, that would be an unusual example of diplomatic understatement.

Live CPAC 2017 live: Steve Bannon taunts media and vows 'every day will be a fight'

Conservative gathering will be forced to reckon with the nationalist populism that has become the dominant force in rightwing politics in the US
 
Read more
Bannon spoke disdainfully and at length about the real threat he identified facing the nation: a critical media that he likes to call “the opposition party”. “They are the corporatist, globalist media that are adamantly opposed to the economic nationalist agenda that Donald Trump has,” Bannon yelled.
Bannon clearly shares Trump’s burning sense of resentment at being excluded from the establishment. For his boss, that reached a peak with the humiliation of President Obama’s jokes at the White House Correspondents Dinner.
For Bannon, now safely inside the West Wing, that means still seeing the world through the lens of the Breitbart website that shocked the media conscience with so much alt-right trash. At one point on Thursday, Bannon even used the phrase “we at Breitbart”, as if there were no real difference between his old job in digital far-right media and his new job as a presidential adviser.
Bannon predicted the media would fight “every day” against the Trump agenda, and that the fight would not ease off, as Reince Priebus, the White House chief of staff, had just suggested. “It’s going to get worse,” he intoned.
Priebus was sitting alongside Bannon on stage, doing his best to pretend that the news reports about their rivalry were just some dumpster fire of fake news. But the need to needle each other was irresistible. “He’s not so bad,” Reince stated about Bannon. “Most of the time.”
When asked the softest of softball questions, about what they like about one another, Priebus pretended to admire Bannon’s wardrobe, which appeared to combine The Gap with The Godfather. “I love how many colors he wears,” Priebus said, transfixed by Bannon’s gargantuan old khakis. “An interesting look.”
Priebus went on to praise Bannon’s consistency, loyalty and friendship. Which made him sound like a well-trained pitbull. Bannon praised Priebus for his indefatigable steadiness, which made him sound like a donkey.
Only one of these animals looked and sounded like the boss. Bannon hailed Trump’s stump speeches – all those rambling lists of poll numbers and personal grievances – for having “a tremendous amount of content”. That’s like praising a teenager’s texts for the sheer breadth of vocabulary.
Bannon also described Trump as “the greatest public speaker … since William Jennings Bryan”. After four years of this kind of bluster, American history may never be the same again. Never mind that Bryan was a Democrat and a pacifist; he was also known as a great orator who preferred silver to gold. Then again, this is a White House that appears to think the career of Frederick Douglass has some ways to go.
For his part, Bannon opened a window into the darkness that resides inside the West Wing. He said that Trump was “maniacally focused” on his campaign agenda, which he hailed as “a new political order”. For would-be fascists the world over, this was no doubt immensely reassuring.
“The mainstream media better understand,” Bannon declared, “all those promises are going to be implemented.” So much for the theory that the media was stupid to take Trump literally.

 A top White House official told the media to 'keep its mouth shut'. That's a threat

Francine Prose
 
Read more
For so long we have fixated on so little. The power behind Donald Trump’s throne was a spectral presence.
President Steve Bannon was a nice slogan for town hall hecklers and street protesters – and his dour face was a nice target for cartoonists. But without a voice, we had no character. Bannon was less a human being than a caricature.
For Saturday Night Live, that meant casting him as the grim reaper, orchestrating death and destruction behind a clueless and childish Trump. But with his speech at the CPAC conference, at last the SNL satirists now have some new material to play with: a living, speaking Bannon.
The only challenge is that what lies underneath is as grim as the surface. When you lift Bannon’s mask of death, all you see is a pallid soul who clearly loathes the sunshine.
Posted by Rich at 1:33 PM No comments:

Louis Gohmert, R, TX says he will not hold Town Hall because he might get shot. (He insists everyone have guns)

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/320778-gop-rep-invokes-giffords-shooting-as-reason-not-to-hold-town-hall


Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) on Thursday invoked the 2011 shooting of former Rep. Gabby Giffords (D-Ariz.) at a constituent event as a reason not to hold a public town hall.
"At this time there are groups from the more violent strains of the leftist ideology, some even being paid, who are preying on public town halls to wreak havoc and threaten public safety," Gohmert said in a statement. 
"Threats are nothing new to me and I have gotten my share as a felony judge. However, the House Sergeant at Arms advised us after former Congresswoman Gabby Giffords was shot at a public appearance, that civilian attendees at Congressional public events stand the most chance of being harmed or killed—just as happened there."
 
Gohmert said he could communicate with thousands of constituents through tele-town hall meetings, arguing even more people will be able to participating in town hall meetings held this way.
 
"This technology allows the inclusion of our disabled and more elderly seniors who have opinions but who could not otherwise come to an actual town hall meeting and ask questions," he said.
 
"Then, when the threat of violence at town hall meetings recedes, we can go back to having the civil town hall meetings I’ve had in the past to supplement the masses reached in our telephone town halls. "
 
Giffords survived being shot in the head at a constituent meeting in 2011. The shooting in Tucson left six people dead and several more wounded.
 
Republican lawmakers have been faced recently with hoards of protesters when holding town halls.
 
President Trump earlier this week referred to the protesters as "so-called angry crowds."
 
"The so-called angry crowds in home districts of some Republicans are actually, in numerous cases, planned out by liberal activists. Sad!" Trump tweeted Tuesday.
Posted by Rich at 10:25 AM No comments:

The Resistance to President Trump is homegrown and real upset with the GOP policies.

https://egbertowillies.com/2017/02/23/resistance-real-texas/


Donald Trump presents a silver lining that if realized may be the panacea for a red state like Texas and other red states as well. In an odd kind of way, Trump just may be the catalyst the Progressive movement needed.
President Obama emerged at a time when the American political establishment, Republicans, and Democrats alike, had given the keys to the plutocracy. Trickle-down economics under Reagan and Bush along with the repeal of Glass-Steagall and NAFTA under Clinton made every poor and middle-class American nothing but widgets and commodities.
President Obama created a coalition twice to win two elections healthily. But the ex-President did not create a movement. He did not nurture the coalition post-election. Instead, he spent most of his time attempting changing the policies he believed in to make it more palatable for Blue Dog Democrats and Republicans. That process emboldened the opposition which is a numerical minority that became a political majority. That stance ultimately decimated the Democratic Party throughout the country. Had President Obama nurtured and grown his nascent movement, he would have had a better Affordable Care Act, a better stimulus, and much more engaged grassroots to mitigate Republican fallacies and sneak attacks.
So far Donald Trump continues to prime his constituents, albeit a small but vocal movement. President Obama rarely did that. Trump is in constant contact with his supporters, and he does almost nothing to undermine even the most petulant of them. Many times President Obama would seem to throw his left under the bus.
Americans are no longer waiting for a Messiah. They have finally taken one of President Obama’s most effective messages to heart. “You are who you have been waiting for.” A document purportedly prepared by a few political representatives’ staffers have caught fire. It gave millions of Americans the little guidance to become the catalyst for a real grassroots movement that’s been building organically. The Indivisible Guide is everywhere. It is in the hands of working Americans, homemakers, middle-class people, poor people, activists, and those who have never protested or been activists in their lives.
Posted by Rich at 7:11 AM No comments:

D - Maxine Waters calls Pres Trump and his Cabinet, Scumbags.

https://mic.com/articles/169314/pulling-absolutely-no-punches-rep-maxine-waters-called-trump-s-entire-cabinet-scumbags#.qNbB78UQf


California Congresswoman Maxine Waters isn't here to waste anyone's time. She calls 'em like she sees 'em, and what she sees when she looks at President Donald Trump's newly installed Cabinet are a "bunch of scumbags organized around making money."
During a Tuesday night appearance on MSNBC's All In with Chris Hayes, Waters railed against the current administration and its dubious ties to Russia.
"Can't people see what's going on?" Waters asked host Chris Hayes. "Why do you think they hacked into our election? They hacked into the election because they have to make sure that Donald Trump got elected."
Waters continued: "Donald Trump got elected so that he could help them with what I think is a huge deal, not only to lift these sanctions but to take over all of these Soviet countries and pull them back into the Soviet Union so that they could have access to all of these resources."
But she wasn't done yet.
The congresswoman also had barbed comments for Secretary of State and former Exxon-Mobile CEO Rex Tillerson, claiming that his primary objective in office will be to lift sanctions imposed on Russia by former President Barack Obama for waging a cyber campaign aimed at swaying the 2016 presidential election in Trump's favor.
"Tillerson is there to get these sanctions lifted," Waters said. "I believe it, just watch him, he's going to continue to work on it. This is important for him, he's there because he negotiated the deal for Exxon with Putin."
Waters has been serving up unadulterated realness since the Trump administration's earliest beginnings. In January, she dropped the mic during a 21-second press conference with her claim that FBI Director James Comey "has no credibility."
Posted by Rich at 7:04 AM No comments:

Pres Trump Staff plant LIES and DISTORTIONS to keep Pres Trump Cool and Calm

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/02/staffers-plant-alternative-facts-to-stop-trump-from-tweeting.html


PRESIDENT Trump IS JUST WEIRD to need this.

Several days have passed since the last news story appeared filled with hair-raising reports from inside the White House attesting to Donald Trump’s utter unfitness for office. The latest dispatch from the child monarchy of Donald Trump comes via Politico’s Tara Palmeri, who conveys the methods used by Trump’s staffers to manipulate his delicate and damaged psyche.
The thrust of the story revolves around the constant struggle to prevent Trump from tweeting out angry or false things that degrade his standing with the public by opening up a window into his mind. Palmeri, who spoke with six former Trump campaign officials, discovered that their method for controlling the president is based on a combination of his pathologies:
1. Media criticism makes Trump irrationally angry. The president’s habit of firing off replies to critical media outlets is well known, but Palmeri provides more details of his vulnerability to psychic distress when presented with criticism:
One Trump associate said it’s important to show Trump deference and offer him praise and respect, as that will lead him to more often listen. And If Trump becomes obsessed with a grudge, aides need to try and change the subject, friends say.
2. Trump does not control his own print-media diet. Other than a handful of legacy newspapers and magazines that he reads in print, the rest of the president’s news diet is spoon-fed to him by his staff:
He rarely reads anything online, instead preferring print newspapers — especially his go-to, the New York Times — and reading material his staff brought to his desk.
3. Trump does control his own television-media diet. He surfs cable for hours, a habit that can feed into his self-destructive mental state:
Leaving him alone for several hours can prove damaging, because he consumes too much television and gripes to people outside the White House.
4. Trump’s staff manipulates him by presenting him with favorable “news.” Trump tweets his own message out of a belief that his allies are not defending him with sufficient vigor, so he can he dissuaded from doing so if he sees favorable coverage in the printed-out news collection handed to him:
“He saw there was activity so he didn’t feel like he had to respond,” the former campaign official said. “He sends out these tweets when he feels like people aren’t responding enough for him.”…

“If candidate Trump was upset about unfair coverage, it was productive to show him that he was getting fair coverage from outlets that were persuadable,” said former communications director Sam Nunberg.
5. If there was not enough favorable coverage available, Trump’s aides would plant favorable stories in conservative media. Palmeri reports several such examples of planted stories in the right-wing media:
During another damage control mission, when former Miss Universe Alicia Machado took to the airwaves to call out Trump for calling her “Miss Piggy” and “Miss Housekeeping,” the communications team scrambled to place a story in conservative friendly outlets like Fox News, the Washington Examiner, the Daily Caller and Breitbart.
“Alternative media” describes media that will report the Trump administration’s “alternative facts.” The Washington Examiner and Fox News contain a mix of legitimate reporting with conservative propaganda. Infowars is a fever-swamp conspiracy site run by Alex Jones, who promotes hoaxes like “Pizzagate,” insists the Sandy Hook shooting was faked, is suspicious of fluoridated water, and so on. Jones is barking mad. Breitbart and the Daily Caller lie in the middle ground between normal, conservative, Fox News–crazy, and Alex Jones–crazy. (Jim Rutenberg recently noted the overlap between Jones’s conspiratorial beliefs and Trump’s, but the administration refused to tell him that Trump followed Jones’s claims. Now Palmeri has confirmed it.)
And so Trump’s staff essentially outsources the job of circulating pro-Trump alternative facts to the right-wing media in order to dissuade the president from doing it himself and thereby tarnishing his brand. The president is therefore not only the subject but also the object of his own staff’s propaganda campaign.
Palmeri also reports a fascinating detail about the efforts to confirm Neil Gorsuch. The nominee’s comments to Senator Richard Blumenthal expressing dismay with Trump’s attacks on the judiciary were planned, out of the calculation that demonstrating Gorsuch’s independence from Trump and willingness to oppose his attacks on the judiciary would ease his path to confirmation. “White House officials anticipated that Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch would distance himself from Trump’s attack and thought the planned comments would help the nominee’s bid, said a person with knowledge of the conversations,” she reports. Alas, Trump was not privy to the plan and, filled with rage, fired off a series of tweets attacking Blumenthal:
Trump himself didn’t like Gorsuch’s “disheartening” and “demoralizing” critique. He fired off a tweet criticizing Sen. Richard Blumenthal, the Connecticut Democrat who repeated the comments, digging up a past controversy over the senator’s military record and accusing him of incorrectly characterizing Gorsuch’s comments. Afterwards, Blumenthal and other Democrats criticized Trump and said the president’s comments would hurt his nominee’s chances. Asked if aides and advisers liked the tweet, one White House official said sarcastically: “What do you think?
Posted by Rich at 7:00 AM No comments:

Young Woman presses GOP Cotton about Repeal and REPLACE of ACA! (He dodges her questions)

https://thinkprogress.org/senator-ducks-question-obamacare-efb6a302e386#.4ns4jahic



“I’ve got a husband dying. And let me tell you something. If you can get us better coverage than this, go for it.”
Though Cotton said he would be happy to meet with her and listen more to her story, he never gave her or McFarland more details on the shape of the purported GOP Obamacare replacement legislation.
During their lengthy exchange, Cotton never gave McFarland an answer to her question: In the process of repealing Obamacare, what, specifically, would he do to prevent coverage gaps that could kill people like her?
“My family has been in the Ozarks since the 1800s. We are historically a Republican family, we are a farming family, we’re an NRA family, we’re an army family,” McFarland began. “Now, aside from inheriting their patriotism and their work ethic, I unfortunately inherited an incurable connective tissue disorder called Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome.”
Members of Congress no-show at town halls, so voters are holding events with cardboard cutouts
When lawmakers refuse to hold in-person town halls, groups in many districts are taking matters into their own hands.thinkprogress.org
McFarland gave a quick rundown of the havoc the disease wreaks on her body before telling Cotton the stakes.
“Without the coverage for pre-existing conditions, I will die. That is not hyperbole. I will die. Without the protections against lifetime coverage caps, I will die. Without the Obamacare (or ACA) exchange health care plan that I have elected to continue after my Cobra that is going to kick in after I turn 26 this coming Sunday, I will die,” she said. “Will you have a replacement plan in place to prevent coverage gaps the second the repeal goes through?”
When Cotton tried to move onto other questions before answering her, the crowd shouted him down with chants of “do your job.” When he tried to obfuscate, the crowd interrupted him with chants of “yes or no.”
“Without the coverage for pre-existing conditions, I will die. That is not hyperbole. I will die.”
“Katy, what I’m committed to, is making sure that people with pre-existing conditions like yours, or young healthy people, all have access to affordable, quality care,” Cotton said. “I am committed to making sure we have an effective, smooth transition period.”
McFarland pressed him for about five minutes about specifically how he planned to ensure that. But Cotton continued to dodge her attempts to pin him down.
In his attempts to dodge McFarland’s question, Cotton attempted to lecture her on health care terminology, citing the fact that insurance companies are no longer allowed to discriminate against people with pre-existing conditions. That prohibition is a key tenet of Obamacare.
Eventually, Cotton gave a vague answer suggesting that he supports some of the protections McFarland cited, and that he would “make that clear in the legislative process,” before saying he needed to move on.
“Before they ask theirs, I’d appreciate if you’d actually answer mine,” McFarland said.“But I can see you won’t.” The crowd erupted in cheers.
The next question, however, was just as emotional — and Cotton took just as much of a beating for his stance on health care.
“My husband has dementia, Alzheimer’s, plus multiple other things. And you ought to stand there with him with at home — you expect us to be calm, cool, and collected,” the woman, who had said that she and her husband relied on Medicare, began. “Well, what kind of insurance
“I’ve got a husband dying. And let me tell you something. If you can get us better coverage than this, go for it.”
Though Cotton said he would be happy to meet with her and listen more to her story, he never gave her or McFarland more details on the shape of the purported GOP Obamacare replacement legislation.
Posted by Rich at 1:55 AM No comments:

Wednesday, February 22, 2017

Doctors: We could not create a more Mentally Disturbed Leader than President Trump

https://egbertowillies.com/2017/02/22/mental-health-professionals-trump/

Click the link to see the video.


Doctors: We could not create a leader more dangerously MENTALLY ILL than Donald Trump (VIDEO)


Two brave mental health professionals went there on national TV. They said America, a man with mental illness.Is running our country. He did not mince his words as he colorfully described Donald Trump.

A president who has a mental illness?

Posted by Rich at 1:50 PM No comments:

Affordable Care Act: Watch the Video about it. REPEAL AND REPLACE with caps on health care?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/obamacare-repeal-freedom-paul-ryan_us_58adc366e4b04a0b274ecc7b?




Paul Ryan Makes The Simplistic Case For Obamacare Repeal: You’ll Be Free

Maybe he means the freedom to go bankrupt and ration your own health care.


By Jonathan Cohn

X
House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) says that repealing Obamacare is all about freedom. He’s right, although perhaps not in the way he thinks.
On Tuesday, Ryan tweeted an argument that he and other conservative leaders have made many times before: “Freedom is the ability to buy what you want to fit what you need. Obamacare is Washington telling you what to buy regardless of your needs.”


 Follow
Paul Ryan 
✔@PRyan
Freedom is the ability to buy what you want to fit what you need. Obamacare is Washington telling you what to buy regardless of your needs.
12:38 PM - 21 Feb 2017
  •  
  •  372372 Retweets
  •  
  •  1,1881,188 likes
There’s some truth in that second sentence. The Affordable Care Act forces insurers to sell to people with pre-existing conditions. Plans must cover “essential” services including mental health treatments, maternity care and rehabilitation. Additional provisions cap consumers’ out-of-pocket spending and prohibit insurers from selling plans with annual or lifetime limits on payments.
And, of course, there is the individual mandate. People who decline to obtain coverage must pay a financial penalty, unless they can show that the premiums would be unaffordable.
But do these requirements really mean less freedom overall, as Ryan argues? For many Americans, these requirements and the law as a whole have led to more freedom, sometimes in dramatic ways.
One key reason for government regulation of insurance is that the product is inherently complex, making it hard for most consumers to understand in advance what a given policy will actually cover. In the old days, people could find themselves owing huge bills for hospitalization, rehab or prescriptions because they only discovered after they got sick that their junk or “mini-med” plans left out whole swaths of services or covered just a few thousand dollars worth of charges.
These folks were also easy marks for scams, as state insurance regulators fought a losing battle to keep shady carriers from preying on people without access to decent coverage.

Posted by Rich at 12:31 PM No comments:

Deportation Rules by Pres Trump could cost 5 Trillion to the US Economy.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-trump-deportation-job-market-20170222-story.html


Trump deportation threats to constrict already-tight job market, could cost economy $5 trillion
esident Donald Trump's sweeping crackdown on immigrants in the country illegally will strain an already tight U.S. job market, with one study suggesting that removing all of them would cost the economy as much as $5 trillion over 10 years.
That represents the contribution of the millions of unauthorized workers to the world's largest economy, about 3 percent of private-sector gross domestic product, according to a recent paper issued by the National Bureau of Economic Research. At an average of $500 billion in output a year, removing all such immigrants would be like lopping off the equivalent of Massachusetts from the U.S. economy, said study co-author Francesc Ortega.
"It's a big number," said Ortega, an economics professor at Queens College in New York, who published the study in November with colleague Ryan Edwards. "Undocumented workers are present across the whole economy, even if they are heavily concentrated in sectors such as agriculture, construction and hospitality."






No unauthorized immigrants? Manufacturing, hospitality workforces would struggle

No unauthorized immigrants? Manufacturing, hospitality workforces would struggle

Any immigrant in the U.S. illegally may now be deported, according to a pair of memos issued Tuesday by the Department of Homeland Security implementing Trump's executive orders. In the memos, the administration pledged to hire 15,000 more border patrol and immigration agents and begin building a wall on the Mexican border.






There were about 8 million immigrants in the U.S. illegally working or looking for work in 2014, with California, Texas and New York accounting for the largest share of the workforce, according to Pew Research Center estimates. Most of them are likely to be of working age, which makes them about 5 percent of the U.S. labor force and 3.5 percent of the total U.S. population. Immigrants here illegally include those who enter the country without legal permission and those who overstay their visas.
Following through on plans to deport undocumented workers would hit industries that already complain of worker shortages, said Ethan Harris, Bank of America Merrill Lynch's head of global economics in New York.
The jobless rate in the U.S. was 4.8 percent in January, a level some economists consider to be full employment.
"The challenge is particularly high now because the labor market has tightened up not just overall but in areas in which you would think undocumented immigrants would be important, so that means that it's going to be hard to fill these jobs if you deport these employees," Harris said. "You have to think about indirect effects when you disrupt production in industries in which they're a critical part of getting things done. So there's a transition cost, as well as the cost of a reduced labor force."






For migrant workers on Illinois farms, the job is hot, risky

For migrant workers on Illinois farms, the job is hot, risky

Harris estimates that for every 1 million fewer workers in the economy, GDP would be reduced by about 0.5 percent. That's the equivalent of $94 billion, based on the annualized pace of $18.9 trillion in fourth-quarter GDP.
The Edwards-Ortega research was funded by the Center for American Progress, a Democratic-leaning policy group. White House spokesman Michael Short cited the study's funding from CAP in dismissing the report as "bogus" without offering specific challenges to the findings. He referred to a 2013 report from the Federation for American Immigration Reform that estimates the annual "costs of illegal immigration at the federal, state and local level to be about $113 billion."
Trump ran for president on promises to crack down on immigrants in the country illegally, some of whom he has described as competing with lawful U.S. residents for jobs and contributing to rising crime in some cities. He has said that he would focus deportation efforts on immigrants in the country illegally who commit crimes in the U.S., but immigration advocates say that the government has already targeted law-abiding people who are in the country without documentation, including some with children or other family members who are citizens.






Immigrant community on high alert, fearing Trump's 'deportation force'

Immigrant community on high alert, fearing Trump's 'deportation force'

The U.S. "no longer will exempt classes or categories of removable aliens from potential enforcement," Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly said in the memos.
"When we started this study last summer, our interest was to study the economic role of undocumented immigrants," Ortega said. "Little did we know that, a few months later, this could become a serious policy question."
Posted by Rich at 12:19 PM No comments:
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

The Fam's Links

  • Brianna's Mommy Stories Blog
  • http://margaretandhelen.wordpress.com/
  • Plastic Soup
  • Dusty, Bri, Kids
  • Maureen's Store - Compost It!
  • Ash and Brian's Wedding

Blog Archive

  • April 2021 (11)
  • March 2021 (10)
  • July 2018 (1)
  • June 2018 (3)
  • May 2018 (2)
  • November 2017 (1)
  • October 2017 (16)
  • September 2017 (13)
  • August 2017 (35)
  • July 2017 (30)
  • June 2017 (44)
  • May 2017 (88)
  • April 2017 (70)
  • March 2017 (139)
  • February 2017 (129)
  • January 2017 (151)
  • December 2016 (102)
  • November 2016 (68)
  • October 2016 (103)
  • September 2016 (134)
  • August 2016 (118)
  • July 2016 (123)
  • June 2016 (186)
  • May 2016 (158)
  • April 2016 (155)
  • March 2016 (244)
  • February 2016 (224)
  • January 2016 (172)
  • December 2015 (228)
  • November 2015 (184)
  • October 2015 (191)
  • September 2015 (149)
  • August 2015 (141)
  • July 2015 (166)
  • June 2015 (148)
  • May 2015 (133)
  • April 2015 (171)
  • March 2015 (170)
  • February 2015 (116)
  • January 2015 (201)
  • December 2014 (186)
  • November 2014 (177)
  • October 2014 (163)
  • September 2014 (115)
  • August 2014 (110)
  • July 2014 (125)
  • June 2014 (143)
  • May 2014 (169)
  • April 2014 (176)
  • March 2014 (152)
  • February 2014 (140)
  • January 2014 (266)
  • December 2013 (228)
  • November 2013 (215)
  • October 2013 (283)
  • September 2013 (175)
  • August 2013 (153)
  • July 2013 (178)
  • June 2013 (177)
  • May 2013 (261)
  • April 2013 (340)
  • March 2013 (295)
  • February 2013 (331)
  • January 2013 (203)
  • December 2012 (101)
  • November 2012 (21)
  • October 2012 (31)
  • September 2012 (14)
  • August 2012 (5)
  • July 2012 (5)
  • June 2012 (5)
  • May 2012 (2)
  • April 2012 (5)
  • March 2012 (5)
  • February 2012 (6)
  • January 2012 (24)
  • December 2011 (3)
  • November 2011 (16)
  • October 2011 (9)
  • September 2011 (1)
  • August 2011 (9)
  • July 2011 (4)
  • May 2011 (10)
  • April 2011 (12)
  • March 2011 (9)
  • February 2011 (14)
  • January 2011 (7)
  • December 2010 (8)
  • November 2010 (10)
  • October 2010 (10)
  • September 2010 (13)
  • August 2010 (7)
  • July 2010 (5)
  • June 2010 (4)
  • May 2010 (2)
  • April 2010 (3)
  • March 2010 (7)
  • February 2010 (20)
  • January 2010 (10)
  • December 2009 (11)
  • November 2009 (23)
  • October 2009 (18)
  • September 2009 (19)
  • August 2009 (9)
  • July 2009 (9)
  • June 2009 (19)
  • May 2009 (25)
  • April 2009 (20)
  • March 2009 (32)
  • February 2009 (32)
  • January 2009 (41)
  • December 2008 (46)
  • November 2008 (67)
  • October 2008 (43)
  • September 2008 (45)
  • August 2008 (32)
  • July 2008 (21)
  • June 2008 (17)
  • May 2008 (67)
  • April 2008 (39)
  • March 2008 (47)
  • February 2008 (43)
  • January 2008 (66)

Welcome to my blogspot!

8/2008 I am hiding out in Juneau, Alaska! How many bears will hunt me?

Search This Blog

About Me

My photo
Rich
3/11 I am in Juneau, AK. I will be heading to the lower 48 in June. I have been able to hike over ice to Mendenhall Glacier until today 3/27/11. It was 45 degrees and the ice is getting flaky. Climate Change is real!
View my complete profile
Watermark theme. Powered by Blogger.