Thursday, February 12, 2015

Boston Snowfall and Global Warming.

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2015/02/12/3622201/brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr/

No single weather event can be attributed directly to climate change. This is common knowledge thanks in part to Kevin Trenberth, a climate scientist who’s played an integral role in explaining how to relate weather extremes to climate change. “The answer to the oft-asked question of whether an event is caused by climate change is that it is the wrong question,” his most-cited quote goes. “All weather events are affected by climate change because the environment in which they occur is warmer and moister than it used to be.”
So if anyone tries to tell you that climate change directly caused Boston’s record-breaking and continuing snowmageddon, that’s not true. What is true, however, is that climate change may have affected the snowstorm — may have made it more likely, may have made it worse than it would have been without so much greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. It bears repeating: “All weather events are affected by climate change because the environment in which they occur is warmer and moister than it used to be.”
The question, then, becomes how? How did the warmer and moister environment in which we now live because of human-caused carbon emissions affect Boston’s historic weather event? Wouldn’t a warmer, moister environment mean less snow? How does that even make sense?
Trenberth, who is a senior scientist National Center for Atmospheric Research, offered his explanation via e-mail:
No doubt there is a big element of chance in having the weather pattern of the storm tracks setting up in an optimal fashion to produce big snow storms one after the after. But in mid-winter, there is plenty of cold continental air to ensure that precipitation falls as snow rather than rain.

How I helped catch a 9/11 Mastermind but then realized The War On Terror was a disaster.

http://www.alternet.org/world/how-i-helped-catch-alleged-911-mastermind-and-realized-americas-war-terror-disaster?akid=12786.294211.bNgZW_&rd=1&src=newsletter1031749&t=16

How I Helped Catch an Alleged 9/11 Mastermind—and Realized America's War on Terror Is a Disaster

I was sure of one thing: I wasn't bringing freedom and democracy to anyone.

Unsafe Access to guns is now the leading cause of death among Children and Teens.

https://news.vice.com/article/unsafe-access-to-guns-reportedly-leading-cause-of-death-among-children-and-teens

Across the US, children are being shot to death — in their homes, in their cribs, in playgrounds, and in supermarkets — essentially anywhere they have unsafe access to guns. And 48 children are now being wounded or killed in the US per day, a gun control group has said.
Recently released Centers for Disease Control (CDC) data indicates that child deaths in preventable gun accidents are on the increase, and that gun-related deaths are now the second most common cause of child and teen deaths, with only cars killing more kids than guns in 2013. Typically, the guns involved in these incidents belong to a relative or parent, according to The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, which campaigns to prevent gun violence, and released an analysis of the CDC statistics this week.
"Millions of Americans have a gun in their homes thinking that it makes their family safer, but every day in our nation, dozens of these families learn just how dangerous and tragic that miscalculation can be," Dan Gross, president of the Brady Center, said in a statement. "The bottom line is, having a gun in the home dramatically increases the danger that a child will be shot and killed."

Republicans know they are in a world of hurt.

http://www.politicususa.com/2015/02/12/republican-gop-control-congress-its-kind-rickety-boat-dock.html

The Republicans are in deep shit and they are beginning to realize it.  They are flailing and they just took over.

Wednesday, February 11, 2015

I read the ANTI-VAXXER manifesto so you don't have to

https://annamirer.wordpress.com/2015/01/30/i-read-the-anti-vaccine-doctors-manifesto-so-you-dont-have-to/

It is a frequent theme in anti-vaccination circles that you should not follow medical advice just because a doctor told you to. I 100% agree. Any doctor who cannot articulate her reasoning to you, acts like you aren’t capable of understanding the issues affecting your own body and mind just because you aren’t a doctor, or answers your question with any variation of “Because I said so,” deserves your mistrust. As is true for most professions, some doctors are stars, most are competent and worth working with, and a few need to find another line of work. Even great doctors make mistakes, or just get the wrong end of the stick on certain issues. You shouldn’t take anything a doctor says as gospel just because of the degree he holds. After all, some unlucky day you might find yourself in the care of a reprehensible sleazebag that has somehow oozed through the cracks in the medical system and is still allowed to call himself a physician–someone like Jack Wolfson.

Exposed: The Republican Sleazy Playbook to Destroy Social Security

http://www.alternet.org/tea-party-and-right/exposing-republican-partys-sleazy-playbook-destroy-social-security?akid=12779.294211.NLYGJL&rd=1&src=newsletter1031685&t=5

In one of its first actions, the Republican House of Representatives of the 114th Congress, changed its rules to manufacture a Social Security crisis.
GOP Representatives Tom Reed and Sam Johnson introduced a procedural rule change, which was buried on page 30 of 32 in House Resolution 5.   It forbids the House from transferring money between the Social Security Retirement Fund and the Social Security Disability Fund - a move that Congress has made 11 times in the past, irrespective of which party was in control. The result is that the Disability Fund, which is expected to run out of reserves next year, cannot be helped using money from the Retirement Fund.  Without this “easy fix” - as the New York Times called it - recipients of Social Security Disability will see a 19% cut in benefits.
At a glance, this move by the GOP-led House seems irrational, cynical - counterproductive.  But if you consider Jude Wanniski’s playbook - it makes complete sense...
Odds are you've never heard of Jude, but without him Reagan never would have become a "successful" president, Republicans never would have taken control of the House or Senate, Bill Clinton never would have been impeached, and neither George Bush would have been president.

In 1929, pretty much everybody realized that instead of building factories with all that extra money, the rich had been pouring it into the stock market, inflating a bubble that – like an inexorable law of nature – would have to burst. But the people who remembered that lesson were mostly all dead by 2005, when Jude Wanniski died and George Gilder celebrated the Reagan/Bush supply-side-created bubble economies in a Wall Street Journal eulogy:"...Jude's charismatic focus on the tax on capital gains redeemed the fiscal policies of four administrations. ... [T]he capital-gains tax has come erratically but inexorably down -- while the market capitalization of U.S. equities has risen from roughly a third of global market cap to close to half. ... These many trillions in new entrepreneurial wealth are a true warrant of the worth of his impact. Unbound by zero-sum economics, Jude forged the golden gift of a profound and passionate argument that the establishments of the mold must finally give way to the powers of the mind. ... He audaciously defied all the Buffetteers of the trade gap, the moldy figs of the Phillips Curve, the chic traders in money and principle, even the stultifying pillows of the Nobel Prize."
In reality, his tax cuts did what they have always done over the past 100 years – they initiated a bubble economy that would let the very rich skim the cream off the top just before the ceiling crashed in on working people. The Republicans got what they wanted from Wanniski's work. They held power for thirty years, made themselves trillions of dollars, cut organized labor's representation in the workplace from around 25 percent when Reagan came into office to around 8 of the non-governmental workforce today.
Next year, when the Disability Trust Fund runs out of money, the GOP’s plan is for force Democrats to become the anti-Santa, yet again. If Congress does nothing because the “easy fix” is unavailable due the Republican rule change, Disability Santa will take a 19% cut.
Reed said of his rule change, “Anyone who cares about finding a fair solution for both the catastrophically disabled who depend on SSDI and senior citizens who depend on Social Security knows that we must find a long-term solution which protects both of them rather than a short term band aid which threatens them both.” It is clear that the GOP plan is to use this unnecessary, manufactured crisis as an opening to “reform” Social Security - translated: cut and privatize.  Thus, forcing Democrats to become the Social Security anti-Santa a different way.
When this happens, Democrats must remember Jude Wanniski - and accept neither the cut to disability payments, nor the entree to Social Security “reform”They must demand the the House rule be changed back, and that the fix used many times in the past, be used again.

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

Nightmare: Here is who would lose insurance coverage if the Supreme Court overrules Obamacare

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/10/supreme-court-obamacare-case_n_6653568.html?ncid=fcbklnkushpmg00000013

If the U.S. Supreme Court strikes down tax credits for people buying health insurance on the federal exchange, about 8.2 million Americans in 34 states could lose their coverage under the Affordable Care Act. Most of the people likely to be affected are white, employed, and low- to middle-class. They also are concentrated in a single region of the country: the South.
Health insurance rates in those states are expected to rise by as much as 35 percent, which may make coverage unaffordable even for those who don’t qualify for tax credits. Some believe that if the tax credits are disallowed by the Supreme Court, the underpinnings of President Barack Obama’s signature health care law would collapse.
“It will be a horror movie if (the credits are struck down),” said Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association, which supported passage of the ACA

WSJ to Republicans: THIS IS NOT THE WAY TO RUN A MAJORITY

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/02/09/1363426/-WSJ-to-the-GOP-This-is-no-way-to-run-a-Congressional-majority?detail=facebook

You know the GOP is in trouble when the Wall Street Journal editorial board skewers the party's "strategy" on the Homeland Security funding bill. And that it did on Monday, calling the House leadership "weak" and referring to the tea party wing as a “rump minority” that is “playing into Democratic hands.”
The editorial could basically be reduced down to this: Why the heck are congressional Republicans letting a bunch of sniveling idiots run the party into the ground?
While the board sympathized with Republicans who feel President Obama overstepped his executive authority last year when he granted deportation relief to up to five million undocumented immigrants, it also said "immigration restrictionists" had themselves overreached in trying to roll back the president's 2012 program for Dreamers.
Here's some highlights, of which there are many:
Restrictionists like Sens. Ted Cruz and Jeff Sessions are offering their familiar advice to fight harder and hold firm against “executive amnesty,” but as usual their strategy for victory is nowhere to be found. So Republicans are now heading toward the same cul de sac that they did on the ObamaCare government shutdown…

Monday, February 9, 2015

Does Marrage get people off Welfare and get people out of poverty: NO, but it could at a cost.

http://www.alternet.org/sex-amp-relationships/defense-divorce?akid=12773.294211.71ZnSz&rd=1&src=newsletter1031557&t=15

Many Republicans want to change programs like the earned income tax credit to provide benefits to married couples. However, as Jared Bernstein noted when Marco Rubio proposed eliminating the “marriage penalty” in EITC, the primary impact is to harm non-married people, by
shifting current EITC spending away from single parents with kids to married couples with kids (along with childless adults, who get little–too little–from the EITC).
Plans that create economic benefits for marriage (beyond the already-extant social benefits) will end up providing an economic disincentive for divorce and penalize the unmarried. A better solution would be to “socialize patriarchy” — that is, have the public sector bear the burdens of childcare, pre-K education and other labor that is expected to be performed by women without pay. (As Ben Bernanke has noted, such a program would likely pay for itself because it would increase America’s human capital.) At the same time, the public sector should reduce the financial burdens that strain marriages (numerous surveys suggest that financial troubles are the leading cause of divorce) through a stronger safety net. Workplace policies that harm women, such as just-in-time scheduling, should be curtailed. Very few other developed countries actively promote marriage through the tax code, but instead provide a strong safety net and parental leave. In a recent report for the Center for American Progress, Shawn Fremstad and Melissa Boteach have laid out changes to the tax code that could improve family stability.
The problem is that these policies cost money, and would mean transferring wealth from the top to the bottom. In a political system run by and for the rich, such proposals are unlikely to catch on. Thus the disingenuous attacks on single-family households: It’s easier to blame the victims of inequality for their plight than ameliorate the problem.

Republicans having problems with the Responsibility of Governing Thing.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/02/06/1362694/-Republicans-having-trouble-with-the-whole-responsibility-to-govern-thing?detail=email#

Republicans took over Congress with claims that they would Take Charge And Get Stuff Done. It's not so easy, they're finding. For one thing, Senate Democrats aren't going to unilaterally disarm and forego the filibuster that Republicans used so aggressively while in the minority. But divisions among Republicans are also turning out to be a major stumbling block.
Case in point: funding the Department of Homeland Security. House Republicans want to use the funding to demand deportation of immigrants. But even if they didn't have to contend with Democrats, Senate Republicans aren't all entirely on board with that. That sets up conflict between House and Senate Republicans. DHS funding needs to be passed by February 27, a date that's coming up fast when you consider that Congress will be in recess the week of February 16. Responsibility is on Republicans, but the extremists of the House don't want to accept that:
Some Republicans acknowledge that the immigration aspects of the Homeland Security bill will have to be stripped out. The question they cannot resolve is how to get conservative lawmakers to realize that. Some have suggested that the repeated Senate votes that all end the same way, in defeat, will help drive that point home. Part of the problem that some Senate Republicans find so frustrating is that their colleagues in the House do not always seem to appreciate that a majority in the Senate does not mean that the party controls every outcome.

5 Facts that show working Americans are Seriously Struggling.

http://www.alternet.org/economy/5-facts-show-half-america-seriously-struggling?akid=12773.294211.71ZnSz&rd=1&src=newsletter1031557&t=7

1. No Money for Unexpected Bills A recent Bankrate poll found that almost two-thirds of Americans didn't have savings available to cover a $500 repair bill or a $1,000 emergency room visit.

2. 40 Percent Collapse in Household Wealth Over half of Americans have good reason to feel poor. Between 2007 and 2013 median wealth dropped a shocking 40 percent, leaving the poorest half with negative wealth (because of debt), and a full 60% of households owning, in total, about as much as the nation's 94 richest individuals.
 3. Cost of Living Surges as Income Falls Official poverty measures are based largely on the food costs of the 1950s. But food costs have doubledsince 1978, housing has more than tripled, and college tuition is eleven times higher. The cost of raising a child increased by 40 percent between 2000 and 2010.
4. Lots of New Jobs (Below Living Wage) 
Worse yet, the lowest paid workers, those in housekeeping and home health care and food service, have seen their wages drop 6 to 8 percent (although wages overall rose about 2 percent in 2014).

5. Our Greatest Shame: Half of the Children Feeling Poverty Over half of public school students are poor enough to qualify for lunch subsidies. There's been a stunning70 percent increase since the recession in the number of children on food stamps. State of Working America reported that almost half of black children under the age of six are living in poverty. 



Killers for Christ! It is not only Islamic Religious Killers.

http://www.alternet.org/belief/think-islamists-are-only-religious-terrorists-meet-some-famous-killers-christ?akid=12773.294211.71ZnSz&rd=1&src=newsletter1031557&t=13

Nazi:  Many conservatives have attempted to obscure the Nazi Party’s ties to extreme Christianism by asserting the Nazi officers dabbled in the occult or to risibly accuse the German National Socialist Party of being a left-wing, atheist organization. In fact the Nazis were staunchly Christian and relied heavily on the anti-Semitic theories and writings of Martin Luther, founder of the Protestant church.

The Ku Klux Klan
America’s earliest home-grown white nationalist militia rooted their pro-segregation philosophy and anti-black and anti-Jew violence in the belief that they were enforcing God’s law on behalf of the chosen people, the white race.

The Otherside Lounge Bombing
In 1997, Christian terrorist Eric Robert Rudolf planted and detonated a homemade bomb at the Atlanta LGBT bar the Otherside Lounge. Four people were injured. A second bomb failed to detonate.

So-called “pro-life” organizations have become some of the most dangerous and violent religious zealots in the U.S. today. It is hard to isolate any single incident because over the last two decades, groups like Operation Rescue have set fire to women’s health centers, murdered doctors like Kansas’ Dr. George Tiller in cold blood, and gunned down clinic workers, nurses and bystanders.

Saturday, February 7, 2015

Teacher says she would rather quit than harm the kids in her care. (20 hours of test is crazy she says.)

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/02/06/1362623/--I-would-rather-stand-in-an-unemployment-line-than-harm-the-children-in-my-care?detail=email

I applaud this lady.  A hero.

Elyria 5th-grade teacher Dawn Neely Randall finally spoke out over fears of reprisal against the 20 hours of tests designed for Ohio public school students.
From her Facebook post:
Well, I did it. I addressed our school board. I had packets for each member as well as our superintendent and walked them through sample PARCC passages that had no clear articulation through the grades and shared with them information straight from the website that proved that the maturity matrix of many passages were well beyond the students' grade levels.
Randall encouraged the school board to stand up to Columbus and for Elyria students. The Lorain County Chronicle featured her story here.

New Rule: Bill Maher: Sarah Palin - 'The Cryptologist checked it out' Not another language - just stupid

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/02/bill-maher-mocks-incoherent-sarah-palin-for-being-ditched-by-conservatives-the-emperor-has-no-clues/

Real Time host Bill Maher said on Friday that he was impressed by how many conservative commentators were distancing themselves from former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R) following her infamous speech in Iowa.
“It was as if the scales fell from their eyes and they were finally able to admit, the emperor has no clues,” Maher said. They called her speech ‘incoherent,’ ‘a farce,’ ‘unseemly’ — words that might have stung Sarah if she knew what they meant.”

Friday, February 6, 2015

Man saves a whale and the whale is very appreciative

http://www.collective-evolution.com/2014/04/03/whale-shows-amazing-appreciation-after-being-rescued-from-tangeld-net/

All animals are altruistic, compassionate, caring, emotional and especially intelligent. Today, the way we define intelligence is completely off, and I believe that many of our marine brothers and sisters are much more intelligent than human beings, at an exponential level. I think we have lots to learn about them, and from them.
“If animals could speak, mankind would weep.” – Anthony Douglas

Guns: Debate Belongs in the Public because it is a Public Health Policy that affects us all.

http://www.concordmonitor.com/home/15418364-95/my-turn-debate-over-guns-belongs-in-the-arena-of-public-health-policy

We live in a culture of fear-mongering. There are many fears to catalog. There is fear of terrorism, foreign and domestic. Then there are mass shootings at colleges, schools, movie theaters, religious sites and malls. There are serial killers, drug lords, gangs and just common criminals. The list is long.
We have a 24/7 media spin cycle that thrives on sensationalism. Shootings, especially mass shootings, grab large audiences so they are featured by many cable outlets. Politics are secondary. Whether it is Fox News or MSNBC, they all cover it for the ratings.
I would submit that fear-mongering has damaged our collective lives. All the sensationalist coverage has led us to expect Charlie Hebdo-type episodes. Even in sleepy backroads New Hampshire, we are not immune. The local history of no such carnage does not seem to reassure.

Religion Should bind people together, NOT A REASON TO KILL EACH OTHER.

http://truth-out.org/buzzflash/commentary/religion-should-be-what-binds-us-together-not-what-justifies-killing-each-other

How many people have died, are dying now and will continue to die in the name of religion?
Extremely few religions can claim bragging rights that other religions have been more brutal. Look at history, even the tamest of religious followings have historically had their benighted moment of barbaric conquest.
Mark Morford of The San Francisco Chronicle recently spoke to how religion, which is revered by most societies (as long as it is the dominant religion of that nation or social order) will, according to Morford, "be the death of us":
The main reason we’re on the fun train to self-extermination, and can’t/won’t get off.
It’s not climate change. Not overpopulation. Not war, or disease, or resource abuse. Those are all very real, but they’re also merely the consequence, the end result of centuries of blind, dogmatic adherence to, well, to God.
With this book I thee rule and control. Like, forever.
That’s right, the biggest problem humanity faces – and has faced for just about ever – is religion. Rabid tribalism, delusory moral laws and aggressive, antagonistic superstition that pits us against each other, against nature, against science, against anyone who might have invented a different god (or gods than ours).

Yes, ISIS burned a man alive: Americans burned thousands of blacks alive. (Blacks burned bodies were put on post cards).

http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/yes-isis-burned-man-alive-white-americans-did-same-thing-thousands-black-people

ISIS's burning alive of Muadh al Kasasbeh has been denounced as an act of savagery, barbarism, and wanton cruelty--one from the "dark ages" and not of the modern world.
American Exceptionalism blinds those who share its gaze to uncomfortable facts and truths about their own country.
For almost a century, the United States practiced a unique cultural ritual that was as least as gruesome as the "medieval" punishments meted out by ISIS against its foes.
What is now known as "spectacular lynching" involved the ceremonial torture, murder--and yes, burning alive--of black Americans by whites. Like ISIS's use of digital media to circulate images of the torturous death of Muadh al Kasasbeh by fire, the spectacular lynchings of the black body were shared via postcards and other media.
In fact, the burned to death images of the black body were a form of mass culture in 19th and 20th century America.

Supreme Court is Political for 5 Justices: Their legacy could be shameful. Great Editorial

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/02/05/1362516/-Greenhouse-The-Supreme-Court-is-on-the-front-lines-of-a-partisan-nbsp-war?detail=facebook

Greenhouse urges progressives who are pessimistic about the potential outcome in the case to read the briefs, as she has. Reading them, she says, has given her hope for the first time that the government could prevail here. But her hope seems to be slim, or she wouldn't write this:
I said earlier that this case is as profound in its implications as the earlier constitutional one. The fate of the statute hung in the balance then and hangs in the balance today, but I mean more than that. This time, so does the honor of the Supreme Court. To reject the government’s defense of the law, the justices would have to suspend their own settled approach to statutory interpretation as well as their often-stated view of how Congress should act toward the states. I have no doubt that the justices who cast the necessary votes to add King v. Burwell to the court’s docket were happy to help themselves to a second chance to do what they couldn’t quite pull off three years ago. To those justices, I offer the same advice I give my despairing friends: Read the briefs. If you do, and you proceed to destroy the Affordable Care Act nonetheless, you will have a great deal of explaining to do—not to me, but to history.
Unspoken is the concern Greenhouse clearly has that history matters much less to the five conservatives on the court than politics. Or at least to four of the five. Read this as another appeal to Chief Justice John Roberts to consider this case at least as closely as he did the original challenge. Does he want to be considered by history as a blind partisan or as a principled jurist?

Texas Edittorial: Open Carry in College Classes is wrong.

http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/editorials/20150203-editorial-texas-bills-to-expand-campus-carry-of-guns-is-misguided.ece

Patrick, Abbott, House Speaker Joe Straus and other lawmakers should listen to the warnings of campus police chiefs, administrators and others who have to deal with the consequences. New UT System Chancellor William McRaven says the bills would create “a less-safe environment, not a safer one,” a position other university presidents echo. We think the former U.S. Navy admiral, who organized and executed the special ops raid that killed Osama bin Laden, knows something about guns.
Campus police chiefs say it is more likely that a gun will be improperly stored or accidentally discharged than its owner will need a firearm on campus for self-defense. Medical experts warn that putting guns in close proximity to students who already may be having trouble dealing with the stress of college is an unnecessary risk.
The legislation seems a solution in search of a problem. The majority of students couldn’t legally carry a firearm anyway because they haven’t reached the legal age of 21. Consider this: Even soldiers at U.S. military bases don’t carry sidearms unless they are training.
Lawful gun owners know there are places where they can’t carry firearms, like elementary schools, polling places, airports and prisons. Colleges and universities are mostly gun-free zones now. Keep them that way.
WHAT HE SAID
“As chancellor of a system educating over 210,000 students and with over 90,000 faculty and staff, my utmost concern is their safety.” — UT System Chancellor William McRaven, in a letter opposing campus carry bill in the Legislature

Thursday, February 5, 2015

Angry Christian gets a perfect and polite talking to by an athiest

http://www.alternet.org/belief/angry-christian-rails-against-humanism-and-atheists-polite-response-perfect?akid=12758.294211.HcQMtf&rd=1&src=newsletter1031398&t=16



“Humanism,” he explained, “is a nonreligious world view that — instead of looking to revelation or authority, we look to reason and evidence to understand the universe. Instead of looking to moral rules that come from outside human beings, we look to other human beings to generate values in the here and now and also to generate meaning in our life.”
“Instead of looking externally for some meaning to give value and sanction to the existence we’re having, the humanist view is that men and women in the course of our lives create the sustained meaning together,” Copson said.



How FOX creates its own insane right wing reality

http://www.alternet.org/media/how-fox-news-creates-its-own-insane-reality?akid=12758.294211.HcQMtf&rd=1&src=newsletter1031398&t=6

Every once in a while a Fox personality says something so outlandish he shocks himself. Such was the case when Fox Business host Charles Payne got amped up over Michael Moore’s American Sniper criticism and unleashed a bizarre reading of America’s overseas military efforts. “We have saved the planet,” he shouted at the camera, to the visible discomfort of his cohosts, “and if we go away as America’s policeman, it will be hell to pay.”
The statement was outrage click-gold, but its virality obscured a crucial quality: even a market-drunk paleocapitalist like Payne doesn’t actually believe the American-produced quagmire in Iraq was the real-world equivalent of the Avengers.
Payne’s outburst followed a solid week of escalating rhetoric against Moore, Seth Rogen and other critics of the film. Fox hosts first mounted defenses of Chris Kyle, then of snipers, then of the military, and finally of the Iraq debacle.

Native Girl raped in Police Car when she was handcuffed.

http://www.ifyouonlynews.com/human-interest/native-american-teenager-handcuffed-raped-in-back-of-police-van/

Gallant placed the teenager in handcuffs, then she put her in the back of the police van next to 24-year-old Joe Kritik. Kritik, a four-time convicted sex-offender, was not in handcuffs. That poor decision by the rookie officer would change the life of the young girl forever. The officer then left the vicinity of the van to further “police the area.”
When the officer was out of sight, Kritik took advantage of this opportunity and proceeded to rape the teenager. Restrained by her handcuffs, and with all the doors locked, the teenage girl was trapped with no way to fight back or escape.

Americans want TAX HIKE FOR THE WEALTHY

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/05/tax-hikes_n_6620824.html?ncid=fcbklnkushpmg00000013

Voters in three key battlegrounds support tax hikes on the rich. The share of adults living in middle income households has narrowed. And Hillary Clinton's support is greater now than in 2007. This is HuffPollster for Thursday, February 5, 2015.
BATTLEGROUNDS WANT CHANGE IN DIRECTION, FAVOR TAX HIKE FOR WEALTHY - Quinnipiac University: "President Barack Obama has negative approval ratings in the key swing states of Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania, but voters in each state strongly support his call to raise taxes on the rich to help the middle class, according to a Quinnipiac University Swing State Poll released today. Voters in each state want the next president to 'change direction from Barack Obama's policies,' the independent Quinnipiac University Poll finds." Large majorities say they support rather than oppose "increasing taxes on higher income earners to reduce the amount of taxes paid by the middle class" in Florida (58 to 36 percent), Ohio (61 to 35 percent) and Pennsylvania (62 to 33 percent). [Quinnipiac]

Wednesday, February 4, 2015

Vaccinations are a Proven Benefit to Society

http://theimmoralminority.blogspot.com/2015/02/just-something-for-anti-vaxxers-to-keep.html

Just something for the anti-vaxxers to keep in mind.

"People Could Die and that is OK" The Conservative Mantra to Health Care: WHY IT IS WRONG!

http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/people-could-die-and-thats-ok-why-rights-free-market-health-philosophy-ludicrous?akid=12750.294211.6LAOiX&rd=1&src=newsletter1031340&t=9


News & Politics

“People Could Die and That’s OK”: Why the Right’s Free-Market Health Philosophy Is Ludicrous

They claim that the SSSI program is rife with fraud and that far too many people just refuse to work.
It was startling to see physician and Senator Rand Paul claim the other day that people on disability were faking bad backs and anxiety to get on the dole and cheat the taxpayers. These are real ailments, sometimes totally debilitating,  as anyone who has suffered from either can tell you. Severe back pain can make it impossible to work at any job, even those which only require sitting. Anxiety disorder is a terrible condition that can even make some people unable to even leave their house. What kind of medical doctor would deny such a thing? (If you answered, “one who will willingly trade his professional integrity for political points” you’d be right.)
But this is actually part of the GOP’s ongoing quest to degrade “entitlements” and make America’s health care system the worst in the world for anyone who isn’t wealthy. Their ongoing attack on Obamacare opened up a window to their underlying philosophy about affordable health care.  (They’re not for it.) And now they are taking legislative aim at the Supplemental Security Income portion of the Social Security System. This is the program that makes it possible for people with disabilities to live without begging on the streets.   Despite the fact that the congress has always routinely pushed money back and forth between the retirement and disability portions of the program as the need occurred, the Republicans in congress have decided that they no longer support doing such a thing. The result, if they have their way, would be to cut the meager stipends of millions of disable Americans within the next year.
They claim that the program is rife with fraud and that far too many people are able bodied and just refuse to work. (They haven’t used the term “disability queen”  in public yet, but you can be sure they’ve thought it.) Representative Tom Price, another erstwhile medical professional committed to proving that trusting a Republican doctor to treat you is like asking a convicted robber to house sit,

TX Open Carry Texas idiot threatens Legislators and tells them it is treason and they will tace consequences

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bCJGeXZaRg&feature=youtu.be

He has taken this off the website it was on but it was captured and here it is.  This guy is scary.

9 Revolting Videos or Police abusing people this past month

http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/9-revolting-videos-cops-abusing-people-just-last-month?akid=12750.294211.6LAOiX&rd=1&src=newsletter1031340&t=7

9 Revolting Videos of Cops Abusing People (Just From Last Month)

Cops are killing, pepper spraying and tasing, even on camera.

Tuesday, February 3, 2015

Republicans (House) Just voted 19 Million off health insurance and to raise Medicare rates and drugs too

http://www.politicususa.com/2015/02/03/house-republicans-pass-bill-health-care-19-million-americans.html

Under this bill, kids could not be on their parents insurance until 26, people could be dropped for pre existing conditions, Medicare rates go up and no free check ups and Drug costs would increase for seniors.  19 Million would be dropped from insurance. - actually more.


Roald Dahl writing about his daughter dying from Measles. Vaccinate please.

http://www.vox.com/2015/2/2/7963269/measles-vaccine-roald-dahl

Olivia, my eldest daughter, caught measles when she was seven years old.
As the illness took its usual course I can remember reading to her often in bed and not feeling particularly alarmed about it. Then one morning, when she was well on the road to recovery, I was sitting on her bed showing her how to fashion little animals out of colored pipe-cleaners, and when it came to her turn to make one herself, I noticed that her fingers and her mind were not working together and she couldn’t do anything.
"Are you feeling all right?" I asked her.
"I feel all sleepy, " she said.
In an hour, she was unconscious. In twelve hours she was dead.
The measles had turned into a terrible thing called measles encephalitis and there was nothing the doctors could do to save her.

Health Issues? Watch Forks over knives

http://www.therealfoodchannel.com/videos/cancer/reversing-breast-cancer-with-diet.html

If and when I get sick, I will go on the Forks over Knives diet.  If I get sick, I go back onto the Fork over knives concept.

If Obamacare was repealed - What would happen?

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/01/what-would-happen-if-gop-actually-repealed-obamacare

If the Supreme Court stopped subsidies from flowing to the 34 states that did not establish their own exchanges, 8.2 million fewer people would have coverage by 2016, according to research released this month by the Urban Institute, an economic and policy research outfit. Next year, the number of people insured through purchasing private plans would drop by 69 percent.
Without subsidies to purchase insurance, many people would immediately lose coverage because they could no longer afford it. Others could be kicked off their plans without Obamacare's protections for people with pre-existing conditions. "You would just have an awful lot of people be uninsured, and then that ripples back through the health care system," Jost says. "Basically, you would have a lot of people die because they couldn't get health care."

This is just the tip of the iceberg. A roll back of the Medicaid expansion would cause millions more Americans to lose their coverage and create mayhem for state governments. Without the ACA to plug the so-called "donut-hole" for prescription drugs, seniors would see their drug bills go up.
A Supreme Court decision against Obamacare would cost millions of Americans their coverage, but full repeal by Congress would be even more devastating. Health care experts describe a state of complete chaos were the ACA to simply disappear from the books.

True History of Police: Started to Protect the Masters of Society and the Wealthy

http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/true-history-origins-police-protecting-and-serving-masters-society?akid=12747.294211.qljY-9&rd=1&src=newsletter1031286&t=19


In most of the liberal discussions of the recent police killings of unarmed black men, there is an underlying assumption that the police are supposed to protect and serve the population. That is, after all, what they were created to do. Maybe there are a few bad apples, but if only the police weren’t so racist, or didn’t carry out policies like stop-and-frisk, or weren’t so afraid of black people, or shot fewer unarmed men, they could function as a useful service that we all need.
This liberal way of viewing the problem rests on a misunderstanding of the origins of the police and what they were created to do. The police were not created to protect and serve the population. They were not created to stop crime, at least not as most people understand it. And they were certainly not created to promote justice. They were created to protect the new form of wage-labor capitalism that emerged in the mid- to late-19th century from the threat posed by that system’s offspring, the working class.

CONFLICT WITH RUSSIA POSSIBLE? Yes, Group Think is moving us closer to conflict

http://www.alternet.org/world/group-think-putting-us-precipice-dangerous-conflict-russia?akid=12747.294211.qljY-9&rd=1&src=newsletter1031286&t=27

If you wonder how the lethal “group think” on Iraq took shape in 2002, you might want to study what’s happening today with Ukraine. A misguided consensus has grabbed hold of Official Washington and has pulled in everyone who “matters” and tossed out almost anyone who disagrees.
Part of the problem, in both cases, has been that neocon propagandists understand that in the modern American media the personal is the political, that is, you don’t deal with the larger context of a dispute, you make it about some easily demonized figure. So, instead of understanding the complexities of Iraq, you focus on the unsavory Saddam Hussein.
This approach has been part of the neocon playbook at least since the 1980s when many of today’s leading neocons – such as Elliott Abrams and Robert Kagan – were entering government and cut their teeth as propagandists for the Reagan administration. Back then, the game was to put, say, Nicaragua’s President Daniel Ortega into the demon suit, with accusations about him wearing “designer glasses.” Later, it was Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega and then, of course, Saddam Hussein.
Instead of Americans coming to grips with the painful history of Central America, where the U.S. government has caused much of the violence and dysfunction, or in Iraq, where Western nations don’t have clean hands either, the story was made personal – about the demonized leader – and anyone who provided a fuller context was denounced as an “Ortega apologist” or a “Noriega apologist” or a “Saddam apologist.”

Monday, February 2, 2015

BRAIN DAMAGE IN FOOTBALL PLAYERS is real say Scientists who are dissecting Dead Pro Football Players Brains.

http://www.motherjones.com/media/2014/10/80-percent-former-football-players-traumatic-brain-injury

Yesterday, the country's leading investigators of sports-related brain injuries released what could be their most shocking finding yet: Of the 79 deceased NFL players examined, 76 showed evidence of chronic traumatic encephalopathy, or CTE. The researchers at the Boston University CTE Center have examined, in total, the brains of 128 people who played football at all levels—from high school to the pros—and 101 showed evidence of CTE. The numbers buttress a growing body of evidence that suggests that playing football at any level can lead to grave health consequences.
In case you haven't been following the story, here's how CTE works: When the brain is subjected to repeated trauma—from the severe (and rare) concussion-causing hits to the repetitive, smaller impacts a lineman might absorb thousands of times in his career—its tissue starts to deteriorate. That causes the buildup of abnormal tau proteins, which interfere with a whole host of critical brain functions. In the short term, it can lead to memory loss and impaired judgment; in the long term, it can lead to severe depression and dementia. Ex-players describe its symptoms as crushing, and in many cases, the pain, unpredictable outbursts of rage, and memory loss becomes too much to bear.