Monday’s Supreme Court decision in Burrell v Hobby
Lobby was a blow against consumer protection, worker’s rights, and the
religious liberty of employees who want their medical care to be free of
what their boss thinks Jesus wants for their vagina. But it should be
read as something else, as well: The end of the illusion that the
anti-choice movement is about “life”, when in fact they are nothing more
than a 21st century anti-sex league
it’s becoming increasingly fashionable on the right to portray women as inherently asexual beings who are being tricked by all this contraception into thinking they have to have sex, which allows them to argue that depriving women of reproductive rights is doing women a favor, by giving them an excuse to get out of that icky sex.
it’s becoming increasingly fashionable on the right to portray women as inherently asexual beings who are being tricked by all this contraception into thinking they have to have sex, which allows them to argue that depriving women of reproductive rights is doing women a favor, by giving them an excuse to get out of that icky sex.
This argument has, by and large, not had much exposure to the general public and stayed within right wing circles, though Ross Douthat occasionally flexes the evils-of-contraception muscle
in the New York Times. The Hobby Lobby decision, however, has forced
the issue of contraception right into the mainstream, no doubt
surprising many Americans who had no idea that there was anyone who
opposed contraception, much less that there’s widespread antagonism
against it when it comes to the Christian right. Hopefully, people will
remember the lesson that this is not about “life” or “religion”, but
strictly about the Christian right wanting to control female sexuality
and punish women for having premarital sex ( about 95 percent of women) or for having non-procreative sex ( about 99 percent of women).
No comments:
Post a Comment